[Internal-cg] ICG Call: Doodle for March teleconference

Tue Feb 9 18:29:38 UTC 2016

Dear Alissa.
YEs provided that the call would be
at any window of the following
Regards
Kavouss

11:00 – 12:00

12:00 – 13:00

13:00 – 14:00

Regards

Kavouss

2016-02-09 17:13 GMT+01:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:

> Yes, let’s go ahead and add Feb 29 and March 2 to the doodle. Jennifer,
> could you do that?
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
>
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 3:35 AM, Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> Since there is no real magic on any one day, if the poll does not generate
> a critical mass perhaps we should consider more than one day?
>
> On 2/9/2016 5:49 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>
> Dear Jennifer,
> 05,00 - 06,00 is much better than the two others, otherwise I will not be
> able to attend as that would be a bad window for me.
> KAVOUSS
>
>
> 2016-02-09 6:13 GMT+01:00 Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia>:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>> Per Alissa, please find the doodle link below for the March 1 ICG call:
>>
>>
>> http://doodle.com/poll/h98bi8ks44432552
>>
>>
>> For your reference, the time slot choices are as follows (all times UTC):
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, March 1
>>
>> 03:00 - 04:00
>>
>> 04:00 - 05:00
>>
>> 05:00 - 06:00
>>
>>
>> Responses by Tuesday, February 16 are very much appreciated!
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>>
>> Jennifer
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] *On Behalf
>> Of *Alissa Cooper
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 8, 2016 12:01 PM
>> *To:* IANA etc etcCoordination Group < <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>> internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for
>> Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations
>>
>>
>> It seems most (though not all) ICG members who expressed an opinion about
>> this are ok with this course of action, so we will proceed.
>>
>>
>> Secretariat: please send a doodle poll so we can choose a time for a call
>> on March 1.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Please take a look at the message below from the CCWG list as well as the
>> formal statement from the co-chairs here:
>> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs>
>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs
>>
>>
>> The CCWG is aiming to have its proposal ready for the chartering
>> organizations to approve it before or during ICANN 55. In light of this,
>> Mohamed, Patrik and I believe the ICG needs to do the following:
>>
>>
>> (1) Plan to ask the CWG for confirmation that their requirements are met
>> as soon as the CCWG proposal goes to the chartering orgs, and give the CWG
>> a heads-up that we intend to do that so they can respond promptly.
>>
>>
>> (2) Schedule an ICG call for March 1. Hopefully we will have heard back
>> from the CWG by then and we can discuss approval of our final proposal
>> then, but it will be before anyone is in transit to Marrakesh. We do not
>> have to wait for the chartering orgs to finish our business. If the
>> timeline slips, we can cancel this call when it gets closer to the date.
>> (Alternatively we could confirm approval of our final proposal strictly via
>> email, but I am assuming folks would prefer to do so on a call.)
>>
>>
>> I would also like to ask the group to reconsider the idea of scheduling a
>> conference call at the end of the ICANN week, if we can find a time with
>> interpreter availability. If the CCWG timeline does slip a bit such that we
>> have not yet gotten a response from the CWG by March 1, I do not want the
>> ICG to be in a position of causing any additional delay. If we schedule a
>> call at the end of the ICANN week to discuss approval of our final
>> proposal, we have less risk of doing that. Otherwise it may get bumped to
>> the week following ICANN 55, even if the CCWG proposal gets forwarded to
>> the ICANN Board during the meeting. I firmly believe that every single day
>> matters at this point.
>>
>>
>> Your thoughts on all of the above are much appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>
>> *From: *Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>>
>> *Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval
>> of WS1 Recommendations*
>>
>> *Date: *February 2, 2016 at 11:53:16 PM PST
>>
>> *To: *"CCWG Accountability" < <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>>
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>>
>> Please find below for your information the note sent today to the
>> Chartering Organization chairs, in line with our discussions during our
>> meeting #82.
>>
>>
>> This will be added to our correspondence section of the wiki.
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>
>> *De :* Mathieu Weill [ <weill at afnic.fr>mailto:weill at afnic.fr
>> <weill at afnic.fr>]
>> *Envoyé :* mercredi 3 février 2016 08:52
>> *À :* 'James Bladel'; 'Byron Holland'; 'Louis Lee'; 'Alan Greenberg';
>> 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Lars-Johan Liman'; 'Tripti Sinha'; 'Patrik Fältström';
>> 'Alissa Cooper'; 'Mohamed El Bashir'; 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Lise Fuhr'
>> *Cc :* 'David Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Theresa
>> Swinehart'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía'; 'ACCT-STAFF'
>> *Objet :* Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
>> Recommendations
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>> Yesterday, the co-Chairs issued a formal statement
>> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs>
>>  updating the community on the status of the Work Stream 1
>> Recommendations and providing insight into the steps the
>> CCWG-Accountability will be taking in developing the supplemental draft.
>>
>>
>> Our hope is that the majority of changes from the Third Draft Report will
>> relate to specificities of implementation rather than content, and as such,
>> an additional public comment period will not be necessary before approval
>> by the Chartering Organizations.
>>
>>
>> In light of progress made and in assessing the outstanding issues, we
>> have announced a target to distribute the supplemental report to our
>> Chartering Organizations in time for consideration and approval on all Work
>> Stream 1 Recommendations during ICANN55 in Marrakech.
>>
>>
>> The various SOs and ACs approach their work and schedules differently and
>> we are respectfully asking that you take this into account as you plan your
>> discussions before and during ICANN55.
>>
>> With that said, we encourage any Chartering Organizations that can
>> deliberate and/or approve the Work Stream 1 Recommendations prior to
>> Marrakech to please do so.
>>
>>
>> We are grateful for your input on the Third Draft Report and for your
>> continued engagement in the development of the revised Work Stream 1
>> Recommendations. We hope to continue this open dialogue as the supplemental
>> report is finalized, and we are also hoping that all potential issues have
>> been raised to the CCWG-Accountability so they can be mitigated in our
>> revisions. Our objective is to provide the Chartering Organizations a
>> simple and straightforward approval process.
>>
>>
>> Following approval from the Chartering Organizations, we have asked the
>> ICANN Board to be mindful of the timeline as they plan their review period
>> of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and submission to NTIA.
>>
>>
>> We have seen increased involvement from the ICANN Board as our work
>> progressed since the Third Draft Report. By enabling us to understand Board
>> comments in real-time, the following potential global public interest
>> concerns stemming from the Board’s comments in December, have been
>> discussed:
>>
>>    - Inspection rights have been fully addressed.
>>    - Budget process concerns have been fully addressed.
>>    - Work Stream 2 concerns have been fully addressed.
>>    - Human rights concerns have been discussed and the group has
>>    adjusted its recommendation, however Board concerns still exist.
>>    - Concerns on ICANN’s Mission are still being discussed.
>>
>> As always, please not hesitate to reach out to us should you have any
>> questions or concerns.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing listInternal-cg at mm.ianacg.orghttp://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160209/eb184523/attachment.html>