[Internal-cg] ICG Call: Doodle for March teleconference

Joseph Alhadeff joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Tue Feb 9 11:35:23 UTC 2016

Since there is no real magic on any one day, if the poll does not 
generate a critical mass perhaps we should consider more than one day?

On 2/9/2016 5:49 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Dear Jennifer,
> 05,00 - 06,00 is much better than the two others, otherwise I will not 
> be able to attend as that would be a bad window for me.
> 2016-02-09 6:13 GMT+01:00 Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia 
> <mailto:jen at icgsec.asia>>:
>     Dear All,
>     Per Alissa, please find the doodle link below for the March 1 ICG
>     call:
>     http://doodle.com/poll/h98bi8ks44432552
>     For your reference, the time slot choices are as follows (all
>     times UTC):
>     Tuesday, March 1
>     03:00 - 04:00
>     04:00 - 05:00
>     05:00 - 06:00
>     Responses by Tuesday, February 16 are very much appreciated!
>     Best Regards,
>     Jennifer
>     *From:*Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org
>     <mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org>] *On Behalf Of *Alissa Cooper
>     *Sent:* Monday, February 8, 2016 12:01 PM
>     *To:* IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org
>     <mailto:internal-cg at ianacg.org>>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for
>     Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations
>     It seems most (though not all) ICG members who expressed an
>     opinion about this are ok with this course of action, so we will
>     proceed.
>     Secretariat: please send a doodle poll so we can choose a time for
>     a call on March 1.
>     Thanks,
>     Alissa
>         On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in
>         <mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>> wrote:
>         Please take a look at the message below from the CCWG list as
>         well as the formal statement from the co-chairs here:
>         https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs
>         The CCWG is aiming to have its proposal ready for the
>         chartering organizations to approve it before or during ICANN
>         55. In light of this, Mohamed, Patrik and I believe the ICG
>         needs to do the following:
>         (1) Plan to ask the CWG for confirmation that their
>         requirements are met as soon as the CCWG proposal goes to the
>         chartering orgs, and give the CWG a heads-up that we intend to
>         do that so they can respond promptly.
>         (2) Schedule an ICG call for March 1. Hopefully we will have
>         heard back from the CWG by then and we can discuss approval of
>         our final proposal then, but it will be before anyone is in
>         transit to Marrakesh. We do not have to wait for the
>         chartering orgs to finish our business. If the timeline slips,
>         we can cancel this call when it gets closer to the date.
>         (Alternatively we could confirm approval of our final proposal
>         strictly via email, but I am assuming folks would prefer to do
>         so on a call.)
>         I would also like to ask the group to reconsider the idea of
>         scheduling a conference call at the end of the ICANN week, if
>         we can find a time with interpreter availability. If the CCWG
>         timeline does slip a bit such that we have not yet gotten a
>         response from the CWG by March 1, I do not want the ICG to be
>         in a position of causing any additional delay. If we schedule
>         a call at the end of the ICANN week to discuss approval of our
>         final proposal, we have less risk of doing that. Otherwise it
>         may get bumped to the week following ICANN 55, even if the
>         CCWG proposal gets forwarded to the ICANN Board during the
>         meeting. I firmly believe that every single day matters at
>         this point.
>         Your thoughts on all of the above are much appreciated.
>         Alissa
>             Begin forwarded message:
>             *From: *Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>             <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>
>             *Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Update on Timeline for
>             Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations*
>             *Date: *February 2, 2016 at 11:53:16 PM PST
>             *To: *"CCWG Accountability"
>             <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>             <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
>             Dear Colleagues,
>             Please find below for your information the note sent today
>             to the Chartering Organization chairs, in line with our
>             discussions during our meeting #82.
>             This will be added to our correspondence section of the wiki.
>             Best
>             Mathieu
>             *De :*Mathieu Weill [mailto:weill at afnic.fr]
>             *Envoyé :*mercredi 3 février 2016 08:52
>             *À :*'James Bladel'; 'Byron Holland'; 'Louis Lee'; 'Alan
>             Greenberg'; 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Lars-Johan Liman';
>             'Tripti Sinha'; 'Patrik Fältström'; 'Alissa Cooper';
>             'Mohamed El Bashir'; 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Lise Fuhr'
>             *Cc :*'David Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Bruce Tonkin';
>             'Theresa Swinehart'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'León Felipe
>             Sánchez Ambía'; 'ACCT-STAFF'
>             *Objet :*Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of
>             WS1 Recommendations
>             Dear all,
>             Yesterday, the co-Chairs issued aformal statement
>             <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs>updating
>             the community on the status of the Work Stream 1
>             Recommendations and providing insight into the steps the
>             CCWG-Accountability will be taking in developing the
>             supplemental draft.
>             Our hope is that the majority of changes from the Third
>             Draft Report will relate to specificities of
>             implementation rather than content, and as such, an
>             additional public comment period will not be necessary
>             before approval by the Chartering Organizations.
>             In light of progress made and in assessing the outstanding
>             issues, we have announced a target to distribute the
>             supplemental report to our Chartering Organizations in
>             time for consideration and approval on all Work Stream 1
>             Recommendations during ICANN55 in Marrakech.
>             The various SOs and ACs approach their work and schedules
>             differently and we are respectfully asking that you take
>             this into account as you plan your discussions before and
>             during ICANN55.
>             With that said, we encourage any Chartering Organizations
>             that can deliberate and/or approve the Work Stream 1
>             Recommendations prior to Marrakech to please do so.
>             We are grateful for your input on the Third Draft Report
>             and for your continued engagement in the development of
>             the revised Work Stream 1 Recommendations. We hope to
>             continue this open dialogue as the supplemental report is
>             finalized, and we are also hoping that all potential
>             issues have been raised to the CCWG-Accountability so they
>             can be mitigated in our revisions. Our objective is to
>             provide the Chartering Organizations a simple and
>             straightforward approval process.
>             Following approval from the Chartering Organizations, we
>             have asked the ICANN Board to be mindful of the timeline
>             as they plan their review period of the Work Stream 1
>             Recommendations and submission to NTIA.
>             We have seen increased involvement from the ICANN Board as
>             our work progressed since the Third Draft Report. By
>             enabling us to understand Board comments in real-time, the
>             following potential global public interest concerns
>             stemming from the Board’s comments in December, have been
>             discussed:
>               * Inspection rights have been fully addressed.
>               * Budget process concerns have been fully addressed.
>               * Work Stream 2 concerns have been fully addressed.
>               * Human rights concerns have been discussed and the
>                 group has adjusted its recommendation, however Board
>                 concerns still exist.
>               * Concerns on ICANN’s Mission are still being discussed.
>             As always, please not hesitate to reach out to us should
>             you have any questions or concerns.
>             Best regards,
>             Mathieu, Thomas, León
>             _______________________________________________
>             Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>             Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>             <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>         _______________________________________________
>         Internal-cg mailing list
>         Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>         http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>     _______________________________________________
>     Internal-cg mailing list
>     Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>     http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160209/76519504/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list