[Internal-cg] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations

[Daniel Karrenberg]

Some messages in this thread smelled like preparing for of a change to
our already agreed proposal. What other purpose could a formal meeting
of ICG have? If that were to occur the resulting delay would be
sufficient to sabotage the whole transition 'by delaying it beyond a
feasible point for implementation'. No fundamental change, just more delay.

NB: In my opinion delaying has been the primary tactic used by both open
and clandestine  opponents of the whole thing.

Enough said

Daniel

On 5.02.16 9:37 , Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
> perturbed by your latest message, I would appreciate your sharing with us your doubt or fear: what last-minute fundamental change could occur which might "sabotage the whole transition"?
> Best regards,
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
> À: internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Envoyé: Vendredi 5 Février 2016 08:55:31
> Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1 Recommendations
> 
> Candidly as usual:
> 
> I am smelling that someone is considering to open a discussion to change
> our proposal at the last minute.  We all should be clear that ICG cannot
> do that without consulting all operational communities again which would
> cause a considerable delay. We should project that message.
> 
> Personally I would suspect that anyone proposing a last minute change to
> what we have already agreed has no other goal than to sabotage the whole
> transition by delaying it beyond a feasible point for implementation.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>