[Internal-cg] Use of ICG site for IANA IPR public comment

[Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de]

I also agree to this proposal 
Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

> Am 07.08.2016 um 05:11 schrieb Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
> 
> Dear Alissa,
> You have sufficient support and no objection or abstention to the proposal.
> Please kindly take my comment/ suggestion into account and prepare the letter to be sent to CWG as indicated in my previous message.
> The matter is critical. There is no time to wait
> Go ahead
> Kavouss  
> 
> 
> 2016-08-06 20:54 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel at karrenberg.net>:
>> 
>> Definitely.
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> ---
>> Sent from a handheld device.
>> 
>> > On 06.08.2016, at 07:15, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>> >
>> > FWIW, I think this is a good idea, and what ICG [website] should be used for.
>> >
>> >   Patrik
>> >
>> >> On 5 Aug 2016, at 20:16, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Collectively, the OCs, ICANN, and the IETF Trust have been working on a set of contractual agreements to implement the requirement from the IANA stewardship transition proposal that the IANA-related IPR be held by an entity independent from the IANA functions operator. Those agreements are due to go out for public comment next Thursday, August 11. The group would like to know if we could use the ICG web site and secretariat services to host the call for public comment on these documents. Because these agreements impact all of the communities, and because ICANN and the IETF Trust are parties to the agreements themselves, we were looking for a “neutral” place to host the call for public comment and the ICG site seemed like a logical solution. This would not require any work or input from the ICG as a body, just some resources from the secretariat. The group working on the IPR agreements will sort out how to process and analyze the comments, and that too will not require any work from the ICG.
>> >>
>> >> Because time is short, we need to make a conclusion about where this call for public comment will be hosted by Monday, Aug 8. I realize this is very much a last-minute request and I apologize for that, but if anyone objects to using the ICG site and secretariat for this purpose, please say so on the list before 15:00 UTC on August 8.
>> >>
>> >> I have already been in touch with Jennifer about what would be required here and she is looking into the details with her team.
>> >>
>> >> Many thanks,
>> >> Alissa
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Internal-cg mailing list
>> >> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> >> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Internal-cg mailing list
>> > Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> > http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160807/185fdafe/attachment.html>