[Internal-cg] Use of ICG site for IANA IPR public comment

[Subrenat, Jean-Jacques]

Dear Alissa,

- I support the proposed solution;

- and the suggestion from Kavouss that you, as Chair of the ICG, send a letter on our behalf.

Best regards,
Jean-Jacques.








----- Mail original -----
De: "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
À: "Patrik Fältström" <paf at frobbit.se>
Cc: "ICG Group" <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
Envoyé: Samedi 6 Août 2016 09:35:55
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Use of ICG site for IANA IPR public comment




Alissa, 
I have been following this activity and supportive to have a healthy ,neutral and effective mechanism to carry out public comments process on this important and critical issue. 
Yes I agree with your proposal . 
It sounds good and logical 
What I suggest is if you have receive no comment to the contrary, you prepare a letter from ICG , which has not yet been disbanded yet to CWG and offer the use the ICG web site and secretariat services to host the call for public comment on these documents. 
You do not need the agreement/ consent of ICG Members on the text as they have given their consent to the approach 
Regards 
Kavouss 


2016-08-06 7:15 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström < paf at frobbit.se > : 


FWIW, I think this is a good idea, and what ICG [website] should be used for. 

Patrik 



On 5 Aug 2016, at 20:16, Alissa Cooper wrote: 

> Hi all, 
> 
> Collectively, the OCs, ICANN, and the IETF Trust have been working on a set of contractual agreements to implement the requirement from the IANA stewardship transition proposal that the IANA-related IPR be held by an entity independent from the IANA functions operator. Those agreements are due to go out for public comment next Thursday, August 11. The group would like to know if we could use the ICG web site and secretariat services to host the call for public comment on these documents. Because these agreements impact all of the communities, and because ICANN and the IETF Trust are parties to the agreements themselves, we were looking for a “neutral” place to host the call for public comment and the ICG site seemed like a logical solution. This would not require any work or input from the ICG as a body, just some resources from the secretariat. The group working on the IPR agreements will sort out how to process and analyze the comments, and that too will not require any work from the ICG. 
> 
> Because time is short, we need to make a conclusion about where this call for public comment will be hosted by Monday, Aug 8. I realize this is very much a last-minute request and I apologize for that, but if anyone objects to using the ICG site and secretariat for this purpose, please say so on the list before 15:00 UTC on August 8. 
> 
> I have already been in touch with Jennifer about what would be required here and she is looking into the details with her team. 
> 
> Many thanks, 
> Alissa 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Internal-cg mailing list 
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org 
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org 
> 

_______________________________________________ 
Internal-cg mailing list 
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org 
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org 



_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org