[Internal-cg] FW: FW: [bylaws-coord] DRAFT NEW ICANN BYLAWS - 2 April 2016 version

Mueller, Milton L milton at gatech.edu
Sun Apr 3 16:49:37 UTC 2016


Sorry, I sent this off before seeing that Kavouss had already sent them.
On the topic of redlined versions, or comparisons, Bernard did a comparison in Word which is attached.

From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:37 AM
To: IANA etc etcCoordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org<mailto:internal-cg at ianacg.org>>
Subject: [Internal-cg] FW: [bylaws-coord] DRAFT NEW ICANN BYLAWS - 2 April 2016 version

In case anyone besides me has a chance to review this, here is a draft of the bylaws

From: bylaws-coord-bounces at icann.org<mailto:bylaws-coord-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:bylaws-coord-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of John Jeffrey via bylaws-coord
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 7:16 AM
To: bylaws-coord at icann.org<mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>
Cc: Flanagan, Sharon <sflanagan at sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>>; Cc: Zagorin, Janet S. <jzagorin at sidley.com<mailto:jzagorin at sidley.com>>; Hilton, Tyler <thilton at sidley.com<mailto:thilton at sidley.com>>; ICANN-Adler <ICANN at adlercolvin.com<mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>>; Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer at sidley.com<mailto:jhofheimer at sidley.com>>; Mohan, Vivek <vivek.mohan at sidley.com<mailto:vivek.mohan at sidley.com>>; Clark, Michael A. <mclark at sidley.com<mailto:mclark at sidley.com>>; Boucher, Rick <rboucher at sidley.com<mailto:rboucher at sidley.com>>; Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com<mailto:sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>>; Kerry, Cameron <ckerry at sidley.com<mailto:ckerry at sidley.com>>; McNicholas, Edward R. <emcnicholas at sidley.com<mailto:emcnicholas at sidley.com>>; Daniel Halloran <daniel.halloran at icann.org<mailto:daniel.halloran at icann.org>>; Amy Stathos <amy.stathos at icann.org<mailto:amy.stathos at icann.org>>; Boelter, Jessica C.K. <jboelter at sidley.com<mailto:jboelter at sidley.com>>; Fuller, Miles <wfuller at sidley.com<mailto:wfuller at sidley.com>>; Tam, Tennie H. <tennie.tam at sidley.com<mailto:tennie.tam at sidley.com>>
Subject: [bylaws-coord] DRAFT NEW ICANN BYLAWS - 2 April 2016 version

Dear Bylaws Coordination Group,
Please find attached a document – DRAFT NEW ICANN BYLAWS (vers. 2Apr) (“DRAFT BYLAWS”) for your review and discussion. As you will recall the last full draft was provided to you on 18 March, with the promise to provide another full turn of the DRAFT BYLAWS for your review today on 2 April.  The DRAFT BYLAWS attached is the current working draft among the legal drafting group.  There is also an Issue List attached, which are a set of additional questions and clarifications requested from the Bylaws Coordination Group.
 We ask that you share the attachments with your CCWG, ICG and CWG colleagues who will be reviewing this during this critical work week
Recent Work – During the past two weeks the legal drafting group, made up of Sidley’s team, Adler’s team and ICANN's Legal team reviewed and worked through mark ups and redrafts of the various sections of new ICANN Bylaws.  Also, we have held four separate meetings with the Bylaws Coordination Group during this two-week period asking questions and incorporating that feedback into the new draft.  There is likely to be the need for some additional discussions as we work toward a public comment version of the new ICANN bylaws.
More Work to Do – There is still work to do on the DRAFT BYLAWS, in identifying and working through any remaining provisions in the draft that are not clear, finding any remaining open issues, improving the provisions, and polishing the draft before publication for public comment.  The legal teams remain engaged in review mode and are available for questions and comments during this period.
Legal Teams have not yet “certified” – Since a) the Bylaws Coordination Group, CWG and CCWG have not yet reviewed and reacted to these DRAFT BYLAWS, b) there are still remaining open issues, and c) there is still review and polishing to be done by the legal teams – the legal teams have not indicated yet that the current DRAFT BYLAWS fully meets the recommendations within the Proposals.
As we have indicated above there is still work to be done, including receiving the feedback from those reviewing these DRAFT BYLAWS this week before the legal teams will be in a position to certify the posting version for Public Comment
Next Steps –
1)   Now until 13 April – members of CCWG, CWG, Bylaws Coordination Group, Board and ICG to complete review of these DRAFT BYLAWS and provide feedback to legal teams;
2)   Now until 18 April, (with particular focus during week of 13-18 April) – legal teams to update DRAFT BYLAWS working in coordination with the Bylaws Drafting Group;
3)   20 April – posting date for public comment period for new proposed bylaws – with legal teams supporting that the new proposed bylaws meets the proposal recommendations.
———
As before, we look forward to working with all of you in the coming days, to get ICANN’s Bylaws in the best form possible to effectuate these important changes.
We hope these views of the documents are useful and that you receive them in the spirit that they are offered… to help all of us to be able to collaborate and work through these Bylaws changes in the most effective way possible — to enable the creation of a new and stronger, community empowered ICANN.
John Jeffrey, Holly Gregory, and Rosemary Fei
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160403/b2c0d967/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ComparisonOfBylaws2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1557765 bytes
Desc: ComparisonOfBylaws2.pdf
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20160403/b2c0d967/attachment.pdf>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list