[Internal-cg] comment summary on RZM issues

[Mueller, Milton L]

22 of the submissions made specific comments about the root zone maintainer (RZM) role. Many noted that it is difficult to assess the ICG proposal's impact on the security and stability of the DNS root without knowing how the Verisign cooperative agreement and the roles of Verisign and the IANA Functions Operator (IFO) will be modified. Most of the submissions that addressed the RZM issue felt that the ICANN-Verisign proposal left some questions unanswered and/or raised concerns about the transparency and trustworthiness of the transition process. They asked for consultation with the global multistakeholder community before any major structural changes were made in the roles of the IFO and RZM. This was a consistent theme among business groups and civil society organizations. A subset of commenters asked that the transition remain committed to the organizational separation of the IFO and RZM duties. Other comments asked for the ICANN-Verisign proposal to be reviewed by the SSAC or by the CWG-stewardship itself to confirm that it meets their requirements.


Dr. Milton L. Mueller
Professor, School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150926/34a35b64/attachment.html>