[Internal-cg] action item 2 sub-team 3: PTI related issues slide 4-5

[Russ Housley]

+1

On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:

> In my opinion all that is needed is for the OCs to commit to coordinate
> and to cooperate as necessary when changing operator. The process in
> fact cannot be foreseen because the number of possible scenarios is not
> bounded. So I am with Patrik "agree to establish" and  coordination is
> all that is required.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> On 23.09.15 13:05 , Martin Boyle wrote:
>> I'm fine with this, but would question whether we won't end with only part of an answer if we do not clearly request them to work together on this.  But I do not mind.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf at frobbit.se] 
>> Sent: 23 September 2015 12:03
>> To: Martin Boyle
>> Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] action item 2 sub-team 3: PTI related issues slide 4-5
>> 
>> On 23 Sep 2015, at 6:54, Martin Boyle wrote:
>> 
>>> For this to work, all three operational communities will need to agree to establish some form of cooperation:  we would encourage you to discuss this with the other Operational Communities and if you agree to include this, please send us verbatim text to reflect an agreed amendment.
>> 
>> Can not this be shortened to just:
>> 
>> For this to work, all three operational communities will need to agree to establish some form of cooperation: if you agree to include this in your submission, please send us verbatim text to reflect an agreed amendment.
>> 
>> 
>> I.e. I do not care what process they use. They might even have agreements already.
>> 
>>   Patrik
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org