[Internal-cg] DRAFT message from the ICG Chairs to the CCWG Chairs

[Russ Housley]

Jean-Jacques:

As I believe is very clear from the beginning of my note, in Dublin I was asked to draft a note from the ICG Chairs to the CCWG chairs.  This is the proposed text for that note.  It is not intended to go into the proposal document.

Russ

On Oct 24, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:

> Copy of a message sent on another thread a couple of minutes ago:
> 
> "Colleagues,
> 
> I am opposed to any further addition or deletion of the texts we agreed during our final meeting this week. We only agreed that some grammatical or stylistic improvements could be brought, if truly necessary.
> 
> I kindly request our Chairs to make the ICG abide by the conclusions we reached in Dublin. Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jean-Jacques."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Paul Wilson" <pwilson at apnic.net>
> À: "Russ Housley" <housley at vigilsec.com>
> Cc: "ICG Group" <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
> Envoyé: Samedi 24 Octobre 2015 14:04:52
> Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] DRAFT message from the ICG Chairs to the CCWG Chairs
> 
> Russ, I support something along these lines.
> 
> One observation is that there is a certain contradiction here:
> 
> “We have no interest in telling ICANN what belongs in the mission statement”
> 
> and
> 
> “the mission statement ought to reflect the mission of ICANN without PTI”
> 
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> On 24 Oct 2015, at 20:04, Russ Housley wrote:
> 
>> I have updated the draft text for the message from the ICG Chairs to the CCWG chairs:
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> = = = = = = = =
>> 
>> Dear CCWG Chairs,
>> 
>> During our discussions in Dublin, the ICG recognized that the mission statement in the ICANN Bylaws will be out of date as the CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability proposals are implemented.  This is especially important since the mission statement is intended to become a fundamental bylaw.  We have no interest in telling ICANN what belongs in the mission statement, and others have already made suggestions.  For example, the IAB offered some text in June 2015 as part of their response to the CCWG public comment; see https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2015-2/iab-comments-on-ccwg-accountability-draft-report/.  The ICG believes that the mission statement must accurately reflect the ICANN organizational scope and structure.  In addition, if making the mission statement a fundamental bylaw is not intended to be an impediment to the separation of PTI and ICANN, then the mission statement ought to reflect the mission of ICANN without PTI. The ICG asks the CCWG make the ICANN mission statement current and accurate before it becomes a fundamental bylaw.
>> 
>> Thanks for your consideration,
>> ICG Chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                        dg at apnic.net
> http://www.apnic.net                                            @apnicdg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org