[Internal-cg] RES: Possible

[Mary Uduma]

Clearer now. Thanks Jeo.
I support the formulation.
Mary Uduma
 


     On Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:45 PM, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
   

  Different forms of language have been used to the same end.  A majority of comments supported...  I chose this construction, because the majority of comments which may have even included other concerns did not bring up jurisdiction and some that did, did not suggest that it precluded moving forward on the transition.
 
 On 10/22/2015 7:20 AM, michael niebel wrote:
  
 Yes, Joe, it would.  
 From a systematic point of view: are we positioning also other issues with regard to the question whether they are "considered  as a limiting factor to the consideration of the  proposal" ?   
  Michael  
 On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:50 AM, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
 
  overall.  Would that word as a modifier to comments address the confusion?  the majority of overall comments...
 
 On 10/22/2015 6:47 AM, michael niebel wrote:
  
 Agree. Just one question: does the last sentence " The majority of comments .." mean the majority of comments that raised the jurisdiction  issue or the overall majority of comments ? Michael  
 On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jandyr Ferreira dos Santos Junior <jandyr.santos at itamaraty.gov.br> wrote:
 
Likewise.
 
 Joe's text is accurate and does not predetermine the scope of the discussion on jurisdiction post-transition.
 
 
 Jandyr
 ________________________________________
 De: Internal-cg [internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] em nome de Drazek, Keith [kdrazek at verisign.com]
 Enviado: quinta-feira, 22 de outubro de 2015 8:30
 Para: joseph alhadeff; internal-cg at ianacg.org
 Assunto: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible
 
 I support Joe's proposed jurisdiction language below. It is factual and does not seek to predetermine the scope of discussion post-transition.
 
 Keith
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
 Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:20 AM
 To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
 Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible
 
 Possible text on Jurisdiction:
 
 A number of comments highlighted the issue of Jurisdiction as important.  A minority objected to any transition at all because they perceived that US was relinquishing jurisdiction.  Another minority point of view raised concerns that the jurisdiction was not international or outside of the US.  A number of comments also suggested that CCWG Workstream 2 might be a place to address some of the continued
 concerns about jurisdiction.    The majority of comments did not find
 jurisdiction as a limiting factor to the consideration proposal.
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 Internal-cg mailing list
 Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
 http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
 
 _______________________________________________
 Internal-cg mailing list
 Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
 http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
 _______________________________________________
 Internal-cg mailing list
 Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
 http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
 
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20151022/09e3502e/attachment.html>