[Internal-cg] capitalization

[Russ Mundy]

Thanks Keith, I think this is the best suggestion we’ve had so far.  RussM

On Oct 22, 2015, at 6:01 PM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:

> I think it should be:
> 
> "Names proposal, Numbering proposal and Protocol Parameters proposal." 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>> 
>> Jean-Jacques has suggested that we capitalize Names Proposal, Numbers Proposal, and Protocol Parameters Proposal. 
>> 
>> What do people think of this suggestion?
>> 
>> Personally I have an allergy to capital letter overload — this happens often enough in the IETF and I find that minting terms that then must always be capitalized makes documents less readable.
>> 
>> Alissa
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org