[Internal-cg] Possible dependency language

[Daniel Karrenberg]

As far as I remember the comments this is a fair and clear summary.


On 22.10.15 12:46 , joseph alhadeff wrote:
> Dependencies:
> 
> A number of comments highlighted concerns that there were issues
> external to the Transition Proposal that could impact the proposal –
> collectively these were referred to as Dependencies.  Four main
> dependencies were highlighted.  A small minority of comments were
> concerned that all of the parallel accountability work in the CCWG
> needed to be concluded before the proposal was finalized.  Another small
> minority of comments highlighted the importance of resolving the RZM as
> essential to finalizing the proposal.  The two most prevalent
> dependencies highlighted, though still an overall minority of comments,
> focused on the need to resolve the outstanding issues related to IANA
> IPR as well as the need to finalize the accountability external
> dependency issues of the Names proposal.  A number of comments on the
> dependency on the Names proposal, did not raise issue with substance,
> but rather a concern that the proposal could not be considered complete
> without CWG assurance that there were no more external accountability
> dependencies.
> 
> Do we want a section on Intervening resolution of dependencies?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>