[Internal-cg] Comment received on the ICG forum

[Alissa Cooper]

I think Patrik’s explanation is good and given that our mailing list archive is public we can consider this item closed.

Alissa

> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> wrote:
> 
> A very heartfelt +1 to Kavouss here!
>  
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org <mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org>] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
> Sent: 15 October 2015 16:46
> To: Patrik Fältström; Alissa Cooper; Mohamed El Bashir
> Cc: ICG
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Comment received on the ICG forum
>  
> No comments on the objection raised by Richard,
> But pls kindly avoid to open a new and boring round of discussion on what consensus signifies. You never reach any conclusion .
> Kavouss 
>  
> 2015-10-15 14:25 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se <mailto:paf at frobbit.se>>:
> On 6 Oct 2015, at 19:08, Jennifer Chung wrote:
> 
> > Please find the comment received on the ICG forum, details below:
> >
> >
> > Tuesday 6 Oct: Richard Hill - "How are you defining consensus?" -
> > http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-October/000006.html <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-October/000006.html>
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Suggested description, to be confirmed by ICG:
> 
> ICG do separate consensus for the content of the proposals from each one of the operational communities from consensus that the proposals are implementable (etc). ICG validates that the operational communities do have consensus for the proposals put forward to ICG and then seek consensus in ICG for the compatibility.
> 
> In this process, we have separated the objections in three categories:
> 
> - Comments that do believe NTIA made the wrong decision, which are out of scope for ICG
> 
> - Comments that are on each OC proposal, which has consensus already within each OC, where ICG validate with the OC that the issue have been discussed already (that the correct process have been followed)
> 
> - Comments that are on the ICG evaluation on interoperability and compatibility
> 
> On the last point, after reviewing the public comments, the ICG has consensus that the proposals are compatible and interoperable.
> 
>    Patrik Fältström
>    ICG Co-chair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org <http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20151020/2894c3ea/attachment.html>