[Internal-cg] Continuing / Re-Chartering Thoughts

[Subrenat, Jean-Jacques]

Alissa,

initially I supported the idea of sending a single message to all the communities we represent. But your suggestion has the advantage of keeping things informal, the equivalent of our "getting the temperature of the room". I would therefore support it.

If your proposal was not accepted by a majority of colleagues, I would then insist that there be a single message to all our communities.

Thanks.
Jean-Jacques.






----- Mail original -----
De: "Alissa Cooper" <alissa at cooperw.in>
À: "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Envoyé: Lundi 19 Octobre 2015 17:23:14
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Continuing / Re-Chartering Thoughts

I don’t see a need to craft a specific question and send that question to each community. We were each sent to the ICG from a particular community. Those who think their communities have an interest in this could go consult with our communities, we could set a deadline, and then have a conversation about it after the deadline. This is my basic understanding of what ISOC has done — their position was reflected in their public comments and Narelle has been putting it forth to us. 

> On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> I did not hear universal support for actively reaching out. I heard some
> people say explicitly that the initiative should not come from us. I for
> one find such outreach rather pathetic and weakening our credibility. If
> I am the really only one then fine. So if noone else speaks up I will
> drop that particular point.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On 19.10.15 10:30 , joseph alhadeff wrote:
>> Daniel:
>> 
>> I think the concept was that we could reach out to see if an
>> implementation role for us was needed, with Jean-Jacques suggesting it
>> needed to be a canvass of all communities, not just OCs.   I concur that
>> the validation of implementation work had to be external, not
>> self-determined.
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> On 10/18/2015 9:22 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 18.10.15 14:50 , Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
>>>> ... in this morning's discussion I felt there was a majority view in
>>>> favour of reaching out to our communities. ...
>>> It did not feel like that to me. I heard quite a few people say that the
>>> initiative would have to come from outside. I listened quite carefully
>>> even though I admit to be handicapped by not being in the room.
>>> 
>>> Daniel
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org


_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org