[Internal-cg] Q&As also for engagement session

[Mueller, Milton L]

Narelle:
This is better, we definitely should not revert to the previous one. 
I still have a bit of a problem with the last statement:  

> This version is therefore available to the community as a complete form of
> the proposal in a near final form.

Can we change that to:

> We have therefore chosen to make this near-final version of the proposal available to the community.

"complete form of the proposal in a near final form" seems awkward and I still think there is the potential for confusion about what it is we are making available.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
> Narelle Clark
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 2:52 AM
> To: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>; IANA etc etc
> Coordination Group <Internal-cg at ianacg.org>
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Q&As also for engagement session
> 
> Some language tweaked. As with previous commentators, if this is not liked,
> revert to the previous version.
> 
> 
> Q: When will the ICG proposal be ready?
> 
> A: We expect publish our current draft of the proposal in the coming few
> weeks. We will then seek confirmation from the CWG that their requirements
> regarding ICANN accountability have been met by the parallel accountability
> process (CCWG) and that this version reflects their portion of the proposal.
> This version is therefore available to the community as a complete form of
> the proposal in a near final form.
> 
> 
> Q: What is the status of the final draft of the proposal?
> 
> A: This version will be the output of the ICG process for compiling a transition
> proposal, as far as ICG is concerned. The ICG does not plan to make any
> further substantive revisions on its own initiative.
> 
> 
> Q: When will ICG submit the proposal to NTIA?
> 
> A: We will communicate the proposal to the ICANN board for transmission to
> NTIA as soon as we have confirmation from the CWG that their requirements
> regarding ICANN accountability have been met. This is subject to the timelines
> available from the CWG (and in turn the CCWG).
> 
> 
> Q: What will the ICG do between now and the end of the transition?
> 
> A: We expect publish our final draft of the proposal in the next few weeks. We
> will seek confirmation from the CWG that their requirements regarding ICANN
> accountability have been met by the parallel accountability process (CCWG).
> Once we have that confirmation we will submit the proposal to the ICANN
> Board for relaying to the NTIA. This will complete our mandate. However, the
> ICG plans to remain constituted until September 2016 in order to respond to
> any queries about the proposal.
> 
> The ICG has no plans to undertake any further work beyond submitting the
> proposal. If there were widely supported requests to extend our mandate and
> charter we would of course discuss them. If there were any requests from the
> OCs to change the proposal we would be available to coordinate this
> according to the processes we have used to date.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org