[Internal-cg] tranistion proposal questions

[Narelle Clark]

And I would expect that this condition statement would be removed from the final proposal once the CCWG satisfies the CWG.

That would be the sort of non substantive changes the proposal should get before submission.


Narelle
Envisaging a happy time when everyone agrees

> On Oct 18, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Karrenberg < daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net > wrote: 
> 
> 
> And here is what I propose we say: 
> 
> 
> X013 The ICG has noted that the names proposal is complete on the 
> condition that the dependencies on ICANN-level accountability 
> mechanisms, currently under development by the Cross Community Working 
> Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG), are concluded as 
> specified in the names proposal.
> 
> X014 Before submitting this proposal the ICG will seek confirmation 
> from the CWG that its requirements have been met.
> 
> 
> and shorten the language in the other paragraphs in line with this. 
> 
> Daniel
>