[Internal-cg] Text for proposed charter change

[joseph alhadeff]

Agree that beyond the cataloging function within the proposal, our 
implementation coordination role should be invited....

On 10/17/2015 10:00 AM, WUKnoben wrote:
> I concur with Patrick saying: “If we are to continue coordination, 
> interest for that should come from the OCs”
> But we should be triggering the OCs to point out their own interest 
> and that of a potentially continuing relationship to the ICG.
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> *From:* Russ Housley <mailto:housley at vigilsec.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 17, 2015 3:10 PM
> *To:* Narelle Clark <mailto:narelle.clark at accan.org.au>
> *Cc:* internal-cg at ianacg.org <mailto:internal-cg at ianacg.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] Text for proposed charter change
> The middle name of the ICG is coordination, not oversight.  I have a 
> serious concern with any attempt to change the charter to oversight.  
> Each of the operational communities already has mechanisms for 
> oversight of the IANA functions, and we should not make any attempt to 
> trump or interfere with them.
> Russ
> On Oct 17, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Narelle Clark wrote:
>
>> All
>> This is the text I propose we consider. I hope to still be awake by 
>> the time we get to this topic, given it is scheduled for around 2am 
>> my time. I would be happy to hold off on this discussion if necessary 
>> for a day or few. Please note, my thinking is that this is quite 
>> lightweight ‘oversight’ for want of a better word Co-ordination isn’t 
>> quite sufficient.
>> ----Text follows---------
>> The ICG might at some point have to offer its advice during the 
>> implementation phase of the IANA stewardship transition proposal. 
>> Principally, responsibility for implementation of the new components 
>> for IANA will rest with the relevant OC.  The ICG — as a 
>> multistakeholder body, representative of the wider Internet community 
>> — can provide a lightweight oversight and co-ordination function and 
>> intervene if and when it feels that the implementation details fail 
>> to meet the standards of performance expected for IANA.
>> Dissolution
>> The ICG should dissolve as soon as the implementation phase is complete.
>> ------------------------------------
>> [Checks on the completion should be made at 3mo intervals for a 
>> period of no greater than 12mo.]
>> Thoughts?
>> --
>> Narelle Clark
>> Director of Operations - Deputy CEO
>> *Australian Communications*
>> *Consumer Action Network*
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org <mailto:Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org>
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20151017/cd1dd025/attachment.html>