[Internal-cg] how collaboration works today between the OCs

[joseph alhadeff]

Patrik:

I don't think there's a real issue with keeping the OC 
descriptions/historical function as long as we provide the needed 
examples of cooperation and consultation across different scenarios.  
The mere statement that the concept of cooperation exists is not 
sufficient to make the needed point that collaboration and cooperation 
are context specific/as needed or provide the kind of assurance that 
will address the misplaced desire to develop or impose a specific 
mechanism for collaboration and cooperation.

Joe

On 10/3/2015 2:57 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 3 Oct 2015, at 1:42, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
>> The fact that the bodies that establish registry policies can also choose which operator will run the registry is interesting, but it’s a bit of a subtle point and I think it may be complicated to explain without adding a lot of additional clarifying value.
> Hmm...let me just ensure my point is made clear here.
>
> As each registry is decided upon by the OC defining it, and not the OCs as a collective, collaboration is explicitly needed. They must explicitly reach out to the other OCs and collaborate with them.
>
> That was my point.
>
>     Patrik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20151003/d8e9af96/attachment.html>