[Internal-cg] Status? RE: DRAFT message from the ICG Chairs to the CCWG Chairs

[FMNiebel]

Just to point out that there has been an intensive discussion about the IAB comments on the mission statement on the CCWG list during the last days.
Michael

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 03.11.2015 um 06:06 schrieb Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
> 
> Thanks for the reminder! It’s been a busy week here at the IETF meeting.
> 
> I have fixed the typos in the version below and will send after 20:00 UTC today, Nov 3.
> 
> —
> 
> Dear CCWG,
> 
> During our discussions in Dublin, the ICG recognized that the mission statement in the ICANN Bylaws will be out of date as the CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability proposals are implemented.  This is especially important since the mission statement is intended to become a fundamental bylaw.  We have no interest in telling ICANN what belongs in the mission statement, and others have already made suggestions. For example, the IAB offered some text in June 2015 as part of their response to the CCWG public comment; see https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2015-2/iab-comments-on-ccwg-accountability-draft-report/.  From the ICG point of view, the mission statement must accurately reflect the ICANN organizational scope and structure with and without the PTI, otherwise it will be an additional significant impediment to the separation of PTI and ICANN. The ICG asks the CCWG to make the ICANN mission statement current and accurate before it becomes a fundamental bylaw.
> 
> Thanks for your consideration,
> Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
> 
> 
>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Narelle Clark <narelle.clark at accan.org.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all
>> What is the status of the message to the CCWG?
>> 
>> As last seen below.
>> 
>> Narelle
>> 
>>>>> = = = = = = = =
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear CCWG Chairs,
>>>>> 
>>>>> During our discussions in Dublin, the ICG recognized that the
>>>>> mission
>>>> statement in the ICANN Bylaws will be out of date as the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability proposals are implemented.
>>>> This is especially important since the mission statement is intended
>>>> to become a fundamental bylaw.  We have no interest in telling ICANN
>>>> what belongs in the mission statement, and others have already made
>>>> suggestions.  For example, the IAB offered some text in June 2015 as
>>>> part of their response to the CCWG public comment; see
>>>> https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-
>>>> documents/2015-2/iab-comments-on-ccwg-accountability-draft-report/.
>>>> The ICG believes that the mission statement must accurately reflect
>>>> the ICANN organizational scope and structure.  In addition, if making
>>>> the mission statement a fundamental bylaw is not intended to be an
>>>> impediment to the separation of PTI and ICANN, then the mission
>>>> statement ought to reflect the mission of ICANN without PTI. The ICG
>>>> asks the CCWG make the ICANN mission statement current and accurate
>>>> before it becomes a fundamental bylaw.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for your consideration,
>>>>> ICG Chairs
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org