[Internal-cg] Minutes of the 19 May 2015 teleconference

[Subrenat, Jean-Jacques]

Dear Jennifer,
thank you for v5, which has my agreement.
Best regards,
Jean-Jacques.







----- Mail original -----
De: "Jennifer Chung" <jen at icgsec.asia>
À: "Paul Wilson" <pwilson at apnic.net>
Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2015 11:36:09
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Minutes of the 19 May 2015 teleconference

Dear All,

Attached please find v5 of the minutes of the 19 May call.  This version
incorporates Paul's edits and is a clean copy for ICG approval.

This can also be found on Dropbox here: http://bit.ly/1LPxXKb 

Best Regards,

Jennifer

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Wilson [mailto:pwilson at apnic.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:37 AM
To: Jennifer Chung
Cc: Alissa Cooper; internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Minutes of the 19 May 2015 teleconference

Jennifer,

I made a few small changes to the v4 minutes, which you can see in the
markup.

Paul.


On 27 May 2015, at 2:06, Jennifer Chung wrote:

> FYI, Milton's requested edits to the 19 May call minutes below:
>
>
>
> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 11:14 AM
> To: Jennifer Chung
> Subject: RE: [Internal-cg] Minutes of the 19 May 2015 teleconference
>
>
>
> Jennifer
>
> Very detailed, clear minutes. Thanks.
>
>
>
> A few modifications:
>
>
>
> You quote me from the chat as saying "Mueller stated that he '[does 
> not] think that ICANN is the right entity to ask about 
> implementation'.
> That is a
> correct quote but in context, what I meant by "ask about 
> implementation" was actually "ask about _what is meant by_ 
> implementation." So please put that in. Obviously we need to ask ICANN 
> about their timeframe for implementation.
>
>
>
>
> I am not sure what this statement (it's on the bottom of page 4)
> means:
> "Cooper asked .whether it is the plan to transition away from the PTI 
> (Post Transition IANA)?" What does it mean to "transition away from 
> the PTI?" Did Alissa really say that?
>
>
>
> Relatedly, Knoben is quoted as saying "the actual plan needs an 
> estimated 18 months of further development" - is that right?
>
>
>
> --MM
>
>
>
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
> Jennifer Chung
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 10:19 PM
> To: 'ICG'
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Minutes of the 19 May 2015 teleconference
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Please find attached v2 of the draft minutes of the 19 May 
> teleconference
> (ICG Call #16).  This is also available on Dropbox here:
> http://bit.ly/1BkOOP4.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Jennifer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jennifer Chung [mailto:jen at icgsec.asia]
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 2:18 AM
> To: 'ICG'
> Subject: Minutes of the 19 May 2015 teleconference
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> The minutes of the 19 May teleconference (ICG Call #16) are attached 
> and
> also available on Dropbox here: http://bit.ly/1FJFpaY
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Jennifer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                        dg at apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                                            @apnicdg

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org