[Internal-cg] "Implementation"

[Drazek, Keith]

Agreed, for the Work Stream 1 requirements.

Also, my understanding is that the Co-Chairs of the CWG Transition and CCWG Accountability are discussing any dependencies so the respective timelines will inform one another.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 1:28 PM
To: Drazek, Keith; Alissa Cooper; internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] "Implementation"

Thanks, Keith. Makes sense that they would respond directly.   I guess we
can presume that their response will be factored in to NTIA's consideration of an extension.


J.

On 5/20/15, 10:23 , "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:

>Thanks James. 
>
>The CCWG Accountability Co-Chairs received their own version of the 
>same letter from NTIA, so I expect they'll be responding directly.
>
>Best,
>Keith
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 1:22 PM
>To: Drazek, Keith; Alissa Cooper; internal-cg at ianacg.org
>Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] "Implementation"
>
>Agree with Keith¹s edits.
>
>Where do we see CCWG-Accountabilty fitting in on this?  As a part of 
>our request to Names?  The implementation timeline associated with this 
>group¹s work could be the longest and therefore become the critical path.
>
>Thanks<
>
>J.
>
>
>On 5/20/15, 9:50 , "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Alissa, I think this looks good with two suggested edits in CAPS 
>>below. I think we need to include both (a) completion of proposal 
>>development, and (b) implementation. At least for the Naming CWG.
>>NTIA's request included transition planning and associated 
>>timeframes...including finalization and implementation.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Keith
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of 
>>Alissa Cooper
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 12:32 PM
>>To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>Subject: [Internal-cg] "Implementation"
>>
>>On the call yesterday we said we needed further discussion about what 
>>it means for the transition proposals to be "implemented" before we 
>>can go out to the operational communities and gather input about 
>>implementation time frames. Here is the relevant excerpt from the 
>>letter from Larry:
>>
>>"I ask that the community provide us with an update on the status of 
>>the transition planning and the associated timeframes, including the 
>>community's views as to how long it will take to finalize the 
>>transition plan and implement it after it is approved. We request that 
>>you and the three primary customer working groups provide us with your 
>>views before the end of June, which will give you the opportunity to 
>>discuss these issues with the multistakeholder community at the June 
>>ICANN meeting in Argentina. In providing this feedback, please keep in 
>>mind that the United States Government will need sufficient time to 
>>evaluate the proposal and that all work items identified either by the 
>>ICG and the CCWG-Accountability as prerequisites for the transition 
>>will need to be implemented prior to the ending of the contract."
>>
>>Re-reading this, I think the question we as community reps need to go 
>>ask the communities is something along the following lines:
>>
>>"The ICG is gathering input about how much time the operational 
>>communities believe they will need to COMPLETE PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT 
>>AND implement the aspects of the transition proposal that the 
>>communities have identified as needing to be completed prior to the 
>>expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts, agreements, or entities).
>>From start to finish, approximately how many weeks or months do you 
>>think your community will need to complete the COMPLETE PROPOSAL 
>>DEVELOPMENT AND implementation of these aspects?"
>>
>>This makes it clear that the focus is specifically on what the 
>>communities have decided about what needs to get done prior to the 
>>NTIA contract expiry versus what may be done later, and also that the 
>>extent to which those things need to be "done" should be defined by 
>>the communities.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>
>>Alissa
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Internal-cg mailing list
>>Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Internal-cg mailing list
>>Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>