[Internal-cg] Contracting

WUKnoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Sat May 2 08:26:08 UTC 2015

This is a good idea. It should be directed to the 3 communities providing 
proposals with the request to share it with their members and participants.

Best regards


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Alan Barrett
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Contracting

On Fri, 01 May 2015, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Let me state explicitly that Alissa and I have talked about this and as 
> co-chair of ICG I feel I am required to point out publicly (again) that 
> _everyone_ must use the processes the OCs define for bottom-up 
> multistakeholder participation.
> If someone, specifically ICANN I must say, is not using the process 
> defined by the OC, I feel I will later on have issues to defend whatever 
> ICG will deliver to NTIA.
> So when I say I support a message from us, I do this as a co-chair of ICG 
> and not only as an individual participating.
> What I wrote earlier on was a clarification that ICANN staff might not 
> understand that they MUST participate in the OC processes because normally 
> they are forbidden to participate in the PDPs running in the various OCs.

I would support a message from the ICG reminding everybody that
they are expected to follow the open processes, but I would want
such a message to avoid any reference to rumours or allegations of

--apb (Alan Barrett)

Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list