[Internal-cg] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] [CCWG-ACCT] Ominous update on the IANA transition

[Jari Arkko]

I thought these two e-mails also provided useful information
about the situation. FWIW I also agree with these
characterisations.

> From: Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Ominous update on the IANA transition
> Date: 1 May 2015 16:10:42 GMT+1
> To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> Cc: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Thank you for the statement, and agree it's an important piece to read. To
> add to this, we are raising concerns because suggested new text to the
> language raise a legal issue for us under the existing contract ICANN has
> with NTIA. This is hopefully temporary as the NTIA contract eventually
> expires. In fact, this case is an excellent example of a reason why the
> transition is so essential. We have no desire to affect the results of the
> community processes. We also believe that it would be more appropriate to
> maintain the status quo until the conclusion of the transition process to
> not pre-empt or create a perception of pre-empting any of the community
> consensus process around any areas in the finalization of the transition.
> 
> Theresa



> From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Ominous update on the IANA transition
> Date: 1 May 2015 16:15:57 GMT+1
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> 
> Hi Theresa,
> 
> Thanks for following up.  The legal and timing issues were what I
> understood, too.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> A

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150501/8d495b95/attachment.asc>