[Internal-cg] Sessions during ICANN53

[Patrik Fältström]

Noted

> On 25 mar 2015, at 21:04, James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:
> 
> My thoughts are aligned with those expressed by Milton & Narelle.
> 
> Thanks--
> 
> J.
> ____________
> James Bladel
> GoDaddy
> 
>> On Mar 25, 2015, at 09:02, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> I completely agree with Narelle, I am opposed to adding another meeting at the tail end of this.
>> Remote participation will be of little use because most of us will be in the air or traveling back during the proposed time.
>> If we need a meeting it would be better to hold a telephone meeting a week afterwards, that way we can digest what happened in Buenos Aires after our initial meeting and discuss what to do about it.
>> 
>> --MM
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Narelle Clark
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:47 PM
>>> To: Patrik Fältström; internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Sessions during ICANN53
>>> 
>>> I would really prefer any additional meetings to be as close to ours as
>>> possible as I would like to minimise the time I need to take for this trip.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Narelle
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> Patrik Fältström
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March 2015 6:59 PM
>>>> To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Sessions during ICANN53
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I am looking into the detailed logistics for the BA meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> My suggestion is that ICG part from the work sessions 9-17 on June
>>>> 18-19 have one working session also on Thursday June 25 9-13.
>>>> 
>>>> We have discussed whether we should also try to facilitate discussions
>>>> between the operational communities, but I have not heard any such
>>>> strong requests yet, and do think the OCs and specifically CWG Names
>>>> and CCWG Accountability might have a busy week.
>>>> 
>>>> I will though as co-chair of ICG reach out to the respective chairs of
>>>> the groups and see whether there is interest from their side to have
>>>> us facilitate something.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this satisfactory to everyone?
>>>> 
>>>>    Patrik Fältström
>>>>    ICG Co-Chair
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>>> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150326/533b4167/attachment.asc>