[Internal-cg] Sessions during ICANN53

[Lynn St.Amour]

I can see the rationale for holding a meeting the week after.  And, I also see the benefit of holding another meeting on site at the end of the ICANN week *IF* some ICG members would have the opportunity to meet face-to-face with members of the CWG Names and/or CCWG Accountability WG simply in order to advance our understanding of the progress made/remaining issues.  No decisions would be taken (as Patrik already said), and of course the meeting would be recorded, translated and transcribed.   Will the results of the legal study be done/available by the time of the meeting, as this would likely benefit from additional discussion as well. 

Lynn

On Mar 25, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> I completely agree with Narelle, I am opposed to adding another meeting at the tail end of this. 
> Remote participation will be of little use because most of us will be in the air or traveling back during the proposed time. 
> If we need a meeting it would be better to hold a telephone meeting a week afterwards, that way we can digest what happened in Buenos Aires after our initial meeting and discuss what to do about it. 
> 
> --MM
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>> Narelle Clark
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:47 PM
>> To: Patrik Fältström; internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Sessions during ICANN53
>> 
>> I would really prefer any additional meetings to be as close to ours as
>> possible as I would like to minimise the time I need to take for this trip.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
>> Narelle
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Patrik Fältström
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March 2015 6:59 PM
>>> To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Sessions during ICANN53
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I am looking into the detailed logistics for the BA meeting.
>>> 
>>> My suggestion is that ICG part from the work sessions 9-17 on June
>>> 18-19 have one working session also on Thursday June 25 9-13.
>>> 
>>> We have discussed whether we should also try to facilitate discussions
>>> between the operational communities, but I have not heard any such
>>> strong requests yet, and do think the OCs and specifically CWG Names
>>> and CCWG Accountability might have a busy week.
>>> 
>>> I will though as co-chair of ICG reach out to the respective chairs of
>>> the groups and see whether there is interest from their side to have
>>> us facilitate something.
>>> 
>>> Is this satisfactory to everyone?
>>> 
>>>    Patrik Fältström
>>>    ICG Co-Chair
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
>> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org