[Internal-cg] Steps for handling ICG forum comments ..

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All,
Mine and Joe,s are complement to each other.
May I leave it to Joe to kindly import essential elements from mine ( not
optional action but mandated action 0 and Joe,s wording
Regards
Kavouss


2015-03-17 10:19 GMT+01:00 Subrenat, Jean-Jacques <jjs at dyalog.net>:

> Hello All,
> although I was not present in Singapore for the face-to-face meeting, it
> seems to me that option 2 described by Lynn is closer to what we are aiming
> at.
> And again, many thanks Manal for effectively carrying this work forward.
> Best regards,
> Jean-Jacques.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
> À: internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 16 Mars 2015 11:44:35
> Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Steps for handling ICG forum comments ..
>
> On 13.03.15 3:37 , Lynn St.Amour wrote:
> > Hello Joe, colleagues,
> >
> > I am following up on our open action item on "Steps for handling ICG
> forum comments" (with thanks to Manal for her excellent work on the
> document).   It seems there is fairly significant agreement on the overall
> approach, which is not surprising given our discussion in Singapore (note:
> the minutes from Day 2 of our Singapore meeting cover this topic quite
> well); and I believe we only need agreement on the point below in order to
> close.   Other relatively minor edits were suggested and can be addressed
> secondarily.   Kavouss, at the same time, we can review the document for
> the redundancy you commented on.
> >
> > Briefly, there have been two views put forward:
> >
> > 1 - Kavouss (comment taken from the document in dropbox):  "It is not
> appropriate to leave the option to the operational  community to  receive,
> forwarded copied of comments or express preference to self monitor the ICG
> form .It is fundamental that ICG decides on the matter abnd not to leave it
> to the operational communities to choose receibving I or being forwarded
> or selfmonitor. ICG is the sole and only instant 7entitty which has the
> right to decide on the matter."
> >
> > 2 - Joe (comment from email below):  "I believe that the consensus that
> emerged in the room had included providing the option to communities to
> monitor the comments themselves, but in such case we would ask them to
> confirm this in writing. I think all were agreed that we should not decide
> the "value" of comments addressed to community proposals as that was beyond
> our remit, though we could use those comments to help formulate our own
> questions…"
> >
> > As there have been only a handful of ICG members that have commented, it
> would be helpful to hear from a few more on this point.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Lynn
> >
> >
>
>
> 2 is what I recall and fully agree with.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at ianacg.org
> http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150317/506426c3/attachment.html>