[Internal-cg] [SPAM] Fwd: Information requested

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Jari,
All,
What I requested was a graph that shows
the different organisations involved in the protocol parameters case,
and shows in graphical form also the accountability mechanisms together
with their hierarchcal relations i.e. who reports to whom at the current
situation ,before transition takes place
And I simply asked to show the same things  ( gtaphical form ) for after
transition.
That was all
I did not expect line up opposition lead by some very radical distinguished
colleagues who did not and will not want any assessment notr any question
..
Today in CCWG I told that group was a lovely group  because people  are
friendly and collaborating .We should learn from them and from their
co-chairs who the freidnly atmosphere prevauils
Let us work together
Kavouss

2015-03-09 23:41 GMT+01:00 Narelle Clark <narelle.clark at accan.org.au>:

> Jari, Kavouss
>
> Were my slides useful to you?
>
> Here is a direct link, if the other list was too confusing:
> http://www.internetsociety.org.au/Events/ietf-overview-ACS-TSA20110930.pdf
>
> [From the Australian Internet Society events web page:
> http://www.internetsociety.org.au/Events/ ]
>
>
> Narelle
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko at piuha.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 10 March 2015 8:38 AM
> > To: Narelle Clark
> > Cc: Russ Mundy; Kavouss Arasteh; internal-cg at ianacg.org
> > Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Internal-cg] Fwd: Information requested
> >
> > For what it is worth, I have promised to prepare a graph that shows the
> > different organisations involved in the protocol parameters case, and
> shows
> > in graphical form also the accountability mechanisms. I promised to do
> that
> > because I have a feeling that it will be useful in other contexts as
> well,
> > including various presentations. I'm working on it, but we also have a
> ton of
> > actual technology work at the IETF that also consumes our time :-)
> >
> > As for the comparisons, and further explanations, I'm always available
> for
> > questions, and going into details. But I think I would like to avoid
> re-stating
> > the IETF proposal in new ways, mostly because I probably wouldn't do full
> > justice to what the community wanted to say after careful deliberations
> :-)
> > Agreeing with Russ and Daniel as well.
> >
> > Jari
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150310/cdbe8f4d/attachment.html>