[Internal-cg] "Alternatives"
Drazek, Keith
kdrazek at verisign.com
Thu Jun 25 17:24:06 UTC 2015
That also makes sense to me.
Keith Drazek
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 2:18 PM, James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:
>
> Agree, but I think a fair statement could be crafted along the lines of:
>
> ³IF you considered other alternatives, WHY did you decide against them?²
>
> Thanks‹
>
> J.
>
>
>> On 6/25/15, 13:39 , "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Daniel on this.
>>
>> Keith Drazek
>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel at karrenberg.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To be clear:
>>>
>>> I fully support going to the customer communities and say that we need
>>> to show a public record of how they arrived at their responses and ask
>>> them to give us *pointers* to their public records that we can include
>>> in our deliverable. We can provide a rationale for it as summarised by
>>> Alissa's slide about "public record".
>>>
>>> I do *not* support and strongly warn against going to the customer
>>> communities with the question: "What alternatives have you considered?"
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
>
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list