[Internal-cg] Fwd: [ssac] CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization Consideration and Approval

Wed Jun 24 18:40:51 UTC 2015

FYI: SSAC approve CWG proposal with comments.

   Patrik

Forwarded message:

> From: Patrik Fältström <paf at netnod.se>
> To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>, Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
> Cc: SSAC <ssac at icann.org>, Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>, Byron Holland <byron.holland at cira.ca>, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [ssac] CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization Consideration and Approval
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:38:37 -0300
>
> Lise, Jonathan,
>
> As chair of the SSAC I have the privilege to deliver SAC-072 to you which is the response from SSAC on this question.
>
> In short (excerpt from SAC-072 executive summary, full text is in the document):
>
> The SSAC finds that the recommendations in SAC 069 are satisfied by the CWG proposal.
>
> The SSAC therefore:
>
> 1. Thanks the CWG for its hard work on developing its proposal for consideration by the chartering organizations;
>
> 2. Wishes to continue to participate in the dialogue until the CWG work officially concludes;
>
> 3. Approves the CWG Proposal (11 June 2015 version), with comments.
>
> 4. Understands that the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal is dependent on the ICANN-level accountability mechanisms being developed by the CCWG- Accountability (Work Stream 1).
>
> 5. Welcomes and will consider the CWG’s invitation to SSAC to participate in the proposed post-transition IANA structures.
>
> Patrik Fältström
> SSAC Chair
>
> On 11 Jun 2015, at 11:53, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>
>> Sent on behalf of CWG-Stewardship Chairs by support staff.
>>
>> To: CWG-Stewardship Chartering SOs and ACs
>> The ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO, and SSAC
>>
>> Dear SO and AC Chairs,
>> CWG-Stewardship proposed response to the ICG RFP the IANA Stewardship Transition
>> The Cross Community Working Group on Naming Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship) is pleased to provide its Chartering Organizations with its proposed response to the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) Request for Proposals on the IANA Stewardship Transition for your consideration and approval as per its Charter.
>> The response is the result of extensive work by the CWG¹s 19 members, 133 participants and a team of highly qualified legal advisors over the past year, which included over 100 calls or meetings, 2 public consultations and more than 4,000 email messages. It represents a carefully crafted balance between key requirements, specific legal advice, and significant compromises by all who participated and includes diligent attention to the input received through the Public Comment proceedings. The final proposal has received the consensus support of the CWG-Stewardship with no objections or minority statements recorded for Chartering Organization consideration.
>> As noted in the CWG-Stewardship proposal itself, the proposal is significantly dependent and expressly conditioned on the implementation of ICANN-level accountability mechanisms proposed by the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability). The co-chairs of the CWG-Stewardship and the CCWG-Accountability have coordinated their efforts and the CWG-Stewardship is confident that the CCWG-Accountability recommendations, if implemented as expected, will meet the requirements that the CWG-Stewardship has previously communicated to the CCWG. If any element of these ICANN level accountability mechanisms is not implemented as contemplated by the CWG-Stewardship proposal, this proposal will require revision.
>> We also note that there are certain implementation elements that will require further dialogue in the near future, including with the other operational communities, and these have been marked as such in the final proposal. Two specific issues are particularly important to highlight. One is the finalization of the service level expectations (SLEs), where the proposal includes a set of agreed principles between the CWG and IANA, but these remain to be finalized in the form of a mutually agreed set of SLEs. A detailed plan for this finalisation is being worked on and it is our view that this detail, whilst vitally important, does not impact on the substance of the proposal put to you for approval. The second issue entails the location of intellectual property rights and this needs further discussion with the other respondents to the ICG RFP and ICANN.
>> As per the CWG-Stewardship¹s Charter we now seek your approval to submit this final proposal to the ICG and ask you to consider this approval in accordance with your respective SO or AC rules and procedures by 25 June 2015 to meet the overall timing requirements which would allow the transition to proceed, noting that final approval is conditional on the approval of the CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 1 recommendations.
>>
>>
>>
>> We will make ourselves, together with or other key contributors, available to you at the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires in order to answer any questions you may have and to explain any details of the proposal. For your information, further background documents as well as the slides, recordings and transcripts of recent webinars explain the details of the final proposal are available here: https://community.icann.org/x/sJc0Aw
>> <https://community.icann.org/x/sJc0Aw> .
>>
>>
>>
>> Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Lise Fuhr & Jonathan Robinson
>>
>> Co-Chairs, CWG-Stewardship
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [FinalTransitionProposal_11June.docx]
>
> Patrik Fältström
> Head of Research and Development
> Netnod
>
> _______________________________________________
> SSAC mailing list
> SSAC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssac
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SAC072 SSAC Comment on the Cross Community Working Group on Naming Related Functions Proposal.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 360850 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150624/64b73182/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150624/64b73182/attachment.asc>