[Internal-cg] Preface for the combined proposal

[Manal Ismail]

Many thanks Alissa for triggering this discussion .. I support the points you suggest ..
I also agree with the essence of most of comments, in particular the point raised by Wolf-Ulrich regarding the two recipients of the proposal ..
I also agree that many still do not understand the IANA function but I think we need to be cautious not to include anything in our summary that may be interpreted as criticism ..
Happy to join if more volunteers are needed or await the first draft to keep the drafting team at a manageable size ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Alhadeff
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 8:31 PM
To: alissa at cooperw.in; housley at vigilsec.com
Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Preface for the combined proposal

I would suggest before we get to process we have a little discussion of origin and mandate.

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----

From: Russ Housley [housley at vigilsec.com]
Received: Saturday, 06 Jun 2015, 1:51PM
To: Alissa Cooper [alissa at cooperw.in]
CC: internal-cg at ianacg.org [internal-cg at ianacg.org]
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Preface for the combined proposal

Alissa:

> What points are important to make in the preface? Off the top of my 
> head, I would say we need at the very least:

I think we need to begin with a few paragraphs on the process that the ICG used, with emphasis on the operational communities reaching consensus, and then an opportunity for comments from the public after the parts are assembled.  This will be important in showing that we have met NTIA's criteria.

> - High-level summary of the proposal

This needs to be at a very high level.  We do not want to be seen as speaking for the operational communities.

Milton poins out that: 
> One thing I have learned from the process is that many people still don't quite understand that IANA is a collection of registries, and they may not understand how related or unrelated the names, numbers and protocol registries are. This should be explained.

I hope that NTIA understands this, but we must recognize that the proposal has more than one audience, so making this point clearly is needed.

I am happy to be part of the editing team, but you need to keep it to a workable size however you select the team members.

Russ


_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org