[Internal-cg] Proposal - 24 hrs review

[Patrik Fältström]

Hi,

I think I understand what you are referring to Wolf-Ulrich. As co-chairs of ICG we will talk about what the actual practicalities are of the final submission. Remember that the path will be from us, via ICANN Board to NTIA. This, from my perspective, will require a letter that is sent with this report. A letter from Alissa as chair. To some combination of ICANN Board and NTIA. Yes, ICANN Board might have to issue a resolution, or they might already have done so.

So, to conclude, I do not think we need this _now_ but rather this is a detail regarding how to package our submission when we are at ICANN in Dublin. And yes, we chairs have this on our list to come with a proposal of to ICG.

   Patrik

On 30 Jul 2015, at 7:16, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de wrote:

> Hi Alissa,
>
> Sorry for not having been clear.
> What I mean is just a general sentence recommending to the NTIA to accept the combined proposal.
>
> From the policy work at ICANN I'm used that a report contains recommendations to the body approving the report.
>
> Isn't this applicable here, too?
>
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> Sent from my personal phone
>
>> Am 30.07.2015 um 12:33 schrieb Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>>
>> Hi Wolf-Ulrich,
>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:28 PM, wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for coming back with the question of recommendations in the ICG report - a point I raised in an earlier email but don't know what happened with it.
>>> Do we recommend anything ( maybe conditioned) or we going to do this after the public comment period reflecting the input thereof?
>>
>> I don’t understand your question. Could you re-phrase?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alissa
>>
>>> Maybe I'm really out of track and it has been already covered or decided how to proceed with - and then forget the question.
>>> My problem is that here in South China I could neither access Dropbox not download the documents sent to me due to limited internet access. So I just couldn't read them. It will be better after my return next week.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>
>>> Sent from my personal phone
>>>
>>>> Am 30.07.2015 um 04:11 schrieb Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia>:
>>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> Attached is v7-JC of the proposal that includes the following edits:
>>>> - IANA requests diagram percentage of Number-related requests fixed
>>>> - Visual summary diagram as discussed with Russ Mundy - fixed with key added
>>>> (Alan's request)
>>>>
>>>> Dropbox link to document: http://icgsec.asia/1ShuICh
>>>> Dropbox link to folder: http://icgsec.asia/1OfxHW2
>>>>
>>>> I note that per Martin's previous response,
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/2015-July/001164.html,
>>>> no new text will be added to this particular section.
>>>>
>>>> Deadline for any feedback is 05:00 UTC on July 30.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jennifer
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> Alissa Cooper
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:46 AM
>>>> To: IANA etc etc Coordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposal - 24 hrs review
>>>>
>>>> Attached is v7 of the proposal, reflecting the changes discussed on the
>>>> call. There are three items not yet reflected:
>>>>
>>>> - Changes to the IANA requests diagram flagged by Alan - Changes to the
>>>> visual summary diagram as discussed with Russ Mundy - Text related to NTIA's
>>>> authorization role to be provided on the mailing list by Martin
>>>>
>>>> I believe everything else has been captured in v7. The changes are also
>>>> reflected in the executive summary and have been propagated as appropriate
>>>> to the public comment web site.
>>>>
>>>> We will turn around the diagram changes as soon as we can.
>>>>
>>>> Deadline for any final feedback is 5:00 UTC on July 30.
>>>>
>>>> Jennifer: please add this document to Dropbox.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alissa
>>>>
>>>> <combined-proposal-v7-JC.doc>
>>>> <1.txt>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150730/a18f5325/attachment.asc>