[Internal-cg] Latest version of the combined proposal - v5

Lynn St.Amour Lynn at LStAmour.org
Fri Jul 24 16:41:46 UTC 2015


Hi Russ,

I think this looks good.

Lynn

On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com> wrote:

> 
> After some discussions with folks about possible clarification and shortening of the words I submitted on 14 July for Section 3 of the combined proposal (currently on page 14), I would like to suggest that the following text replace the current sub-paragraph in total:
> 
> The ICG notes that, under the current IANA Functions Contract, the DNS Root Zone Management process currently has three functional roles, i.e., the IANA Functions Operator (IFO), the Root Zone Maintainer (RZM), and the Root Zone Administrator (RZA).  The CWG Stewardship proposal (paragraph 150) states “Post-transition, no authorization for Root Zone change requests will be needed.”, thus the RZA role need not be continued.  However, since there is currently no agreement between the RZM and the IFO organizations for the Root Zone Management process, the ICG notes that some form of agreement between the IFO and RZM that clearly defines the roles and responsibilities of both parties is essential for the secure, stable and resilient operation of the Root Zone of the DNS when the NTIA withdraws from the Root Zone Management process.
> 
> Thoughts and comments are, of course, welcome.
> 
> Russ M
> 
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Jennifer Chung <jen at icgsec.asia> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Attached and linked is v5-MI-LSA-PW-JC.  Dropbox link:
>> http://icgsec.asia/1JiezqA . This includes Paul's latest edits as well as
>> the requests from Manal below:
> 




More information about the Internal-cg mailing list