[Internal-cg] combined proposal assessment

[WUKnoben]

That's correct!

Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Milton L Mueller
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:42 PM
To: WUKnoben ; internal-cg at ianacg.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] combined proposal assessment



> -----Original Message-----
> Wouldn't this then mean in consequence that for the contractual
> relationship of the SLAs no real alternative is given rather than a 
> subcontract
> with the PTI?

Well, for the short term all 3 OCs have agreed to use the status quo IANA 
for their part of the functions. It's just that the status quo IANA is 
becoming PTI. So if you contract with ICANN, yes, you are required to 
contract with either PTI or to contract with ICANN which will subcontract or 
assign the contract to PTI.

But in the future, all OCs do have, and should have, "a real alternative" in 
the sense that they can switch providers according to the procedures set out 
in their proposals. So when you say there is "no real alternative" I assume 
you just mean in the initial setup period of the transition.

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org