[Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin

Wed Jul 8 10:56:12 UTC 2015

Allow me to share a few thoughts until we talk:
- I believe splitting our meetings before and after the ICANN week turned to be very useful in BA
- Sunday seems to be an extremely busy day (also for me) .. Would Saturday morning work? for everyone?
- Prior to the ICANN meeting, I believe we may need more than a couple of hours (ICG analysis of Public comments received - preparatory work for the week - communications plan for this phase which is also identified as peak time, agree on place holders in the final proposal where we need to reflect CCWG approval, if and when approved, ...) .. or this will be mostly finished intersessionally?
- After the ICANN meeting, when CCWG proposal is hopefully approved by its chartering organizations, we can reflect this where we have our place holders; yet, as agreed in BA, we still need to communicate with CWG to make sure the proposal meets the names community requirements .. what is the timeframe for this? will this be accomplished at Dublin? Via a Letter? Email? Meeting? Call?.. Finally are we going to reference the whole CCWG proposal? attach all CCWG recommendations? reference specific names-related CCWG recommendations? 

Looking forward to further discuss on the call ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Martin Boyle
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:52 AM
To: Paul Wilson; Alissa Cooper
Cc: ICG Coordination Group
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin

I also agree.  We do need to spend some time preparing for the week - what questions (if any) we think are still outstanding, for example, as well as the state of play on our own draft (including any additional comments that we have received).

But our main work will be at the end of the week when (for the names bit): CCWG has finalised its proposal and that has gone through the Chartering Organisations;  and CWG has accepted that the CCWG report meets its requirements and that this has been validated by the Chartering Organisations.

Whether Sunday (quite a busy day for many who are active in ICANN) is the best day for the prepare meeting, I have my doubts.

One thought I have:  should the ICG solicit a meeting with Larry Strickling to present our expected final proposal?

Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson
Sent: 08 July 2015 05:56
To: Alissa Cooper
Cc: ICG Coordination Group
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Face 2 face Dublin

I agree.

Hope we can confirm the Sunday timing soon.

Also, I suggest to schedule for a full day on Friday.

Paul.

On 8 Jul 2015, at 4:03, Alissa Cooper wrote:

> My suggestion would be that we plan to meet for:
>
> - a couple of hours at the beginning of the ICANN week (Sunday?) in 
> case we have any final tasks to do related to the proposal or prep for 
> the week ahead.
> - a working session on the Thursday of ICANN week, similar to what we 
> did in BA (but hopefully after the CCWG’s last session) to possibly 
> conclude our work and decide that we’re ready to submit the proposal.
> - a half or full day on Friday after the ICANN meeting is over, in 
> case we don’t actually finish during the week and need time to work 
> more on the proposal. Or if we do finish during the week, we could use 
> a little time to discuss communications needs and the ICG’s role while 
> awaiting USG review and implementation finalization.
>
> Alissa
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>
> wrote:
>
>> Let me ask a followup question which I forgot to ask, and this not 
>> only to you Russ:
>>
>> What do you think should be on the agenda?
>>
>> Patrik
>>
>> On 7 Jul 2015, at 4:58, Russ Housley wrote:
>>
>>> I think the ICG should meet after the ICANN meeting.  The ICG needs 
>>> to know that the CCWG-Accountability work has achieved consensus and 
>>> that it meets all of the requirements for the proposal in hand.
>>>
>>> Russ
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> We have moved back and forth between meeting before and after the 
>>>> ICANN meeting. For the previous meeting we decided to meet before, 
>>>> but have a "followup meeting" on the Thursday of ICANN week. We 
>>>> could also do the reverse, one short prep-meeting and then actual 
>>>> work after the ICANN meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Question from me is whether you, given the timeline, believe we 
>>>> should meet before or after.
>>>>
>>>> Can you all think about what you believe would be the best?
>>>>
>>>> We need to decide shortly.
>>>>
>>>> Patrik Fältström
>>>> Co-Chair
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                        dg at apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                                            @apnicdg

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org