[Internal-cg] Questions from webinars
Patrik Fältström
paf at frobbit.se
Fri Aug 21 15:41:31 UTC 2015
On 21 Aug 2015, at 17:33, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> I have not seen any convincing evidence that putting them in different operators would necessarily threaten 'the stability and security of the internet.'
We all know that for example:
- Other protocol parameters than the ones asked for by IETF is managed by IANA
- Not all protocol parameters IETF ask for is IANA Function at ICANN asked to take care of
So there is a split in multiple ways already today, within the Protocol Parameter OC(*).
And the earth is still spinning around the sun.
Patrik
P.S. This is the reason why SSAC wrote one document on what IANA is and is doing and a separate document on the NTIA Contract with IANA. Two different things that do not match 1:1, and on top of that we have splits like the one described above.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150821/970ae249/attachment.asc>
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list