[Internal-cg] Questions from webinars

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Lynn
I do not know from where you have in ferred that  "*The 3 OCs are or will
be responsible for evaluating the performance of the IFO"  *
Please read carefully The Final Proposal from CWG ,PARGRAPH 105, Bullet 3
and PARAGRAPH 106, SUB PARA. 4, in which the CSC is / will be responsible
to monitor the performance of IFO.Please also read Annex G , Charter of CSC.
We should not invent new ideas.
However,,OCs may, coomment on the performance of IFO in regard with their
area of responsibilties and bring the matter to the attention of CSC.
The text you have proposed is inconsistent with those referred to above.and
thus I am not comfortable to that and in fact object to any kind of
paraphrasing the CWG text.
Regards
Kavouss

2015-08-19 19:25 GMT+02:00 Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>:

> Lynn:
>
> > The 3 OCs are or will be responsible for evaluating the performance of
> the(ir) IFO (through various community managed oversight mechanisms).  They
> will also be responsible for ensuring that any deficiencies are brought
> back into line with expected service levels.  While today, the IFO for all
> 3 OCs is in one organization (department), the OCs have all made it clear
> in their proposals that the responsibility for who their IANA functions
> operator will be in the future will reside with the individual communities.
> >
> > It can be hard to find words that capture the appropriate intent of all
> 3 proposals, so perhaps ICG members from the 3 communities can also help
> clarify/suggest text.  In the interest of moving this along, I suggested
> some edits (in caps) that may help, but again Kavouss, I am not sure I
> understand your objections, so these may miss the mark.
> >
> > Current:  "The three Operating Communities (OCs) are responsible for
> evaluating the performance of the IFO and for making whatever decisions are
> required to ensure their community’s needs and expectations are met,
> including choosing/changing their IANA functions operator."
> >
> > Proposed: "The three Operating Communities (OCs) are responsible for
> evaluating the performance of THEIR IFO and for making whatever decisions
> are required to ensure their community’s needs and expectations are met,
> including choosing/changing the IANA functions operator FOR THEIR SET OF
> IANA FUNCTIONS."
>
> This looks fine to me.  The protocol parameters community has an SLA, and
> the IANA Department publishes the measurements against that SLA every other
> month.  The numbers community is negotiating a similar SLA, and that
> language for the SLA is out for comment right now <
> https://www.nro.net/news/call-for-comments-for-the-second-draft-sla-for-the-iana-numbering-services
> >.
>
> Russ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150819/fd1adc13/attachment.html>