[Internal-cg] Questions from webinars

[Joseph Alhadeff]

Agree.

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 15, 2015, at 5:19 AM, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
> 
> Many thanks Lynn and thanks to everyone who has contributed to this ..
> Apologies for not being able to participate earlier ..
> I'm fine with this version ..
> 
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Lynn St.Amour
> Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 4:03 AM
> To: Drazek, Keith
> Cc: internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Questions from webinars
> 
> Thanks Keith,
> 
> any comments on the other FAQ?
> 
> Lynn
> 
> 
>> On Aug 14, 2015, at 3:49 PM, "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I support Milton's proposed edit.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Keith Drazek
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Aug 14, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Looks OK to me. 
>>> If it's not too much of a nit, I would change the opening of the 6th question as follows:
>>> 
>>> Yours: As noted before, the US government no longer has root zone change approval authority or contracting authority over ICANN.
>>> 
>>> Proposed: As noted before, the US government will no longer have root zone change approval authority or contracting authority over ICANN when the transition is complete.
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf 
>>>> Of Lynn St.Amour
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 1:15 PM
>>>> To: internal-cg at ianacg.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Questions from webinars
>>>> Importance: High
>>>> 
>>>> Dear ICG members,
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you to all those who have reviewed these FAQs.  In the 
>>>> attached document, I accepted all those changes, and believe there is only one
>>>> remaining area needing review.   The response to the question:  "How is PTI
>>>> different from the current IANA department?" was very focused on the 
>>>> naming functions while not making that explicit.  I added a few 
>>>> lines to try and clarify that (virtually all from the various 
>>>> proposals) and to include all the OC proposals.
>>>> 
>>>> A quick review would be very helpful and once we have agreement, I 
>>>> will work with the secretariat to get these posted.  Hopefully very soon, given the>> comment period is well underway.
>>>> 
>>>> Also posted to Dropbox
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Lynn
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org