[Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?

Mon Aug 10 11:42:39 UTC 2015

Dear Patrik
I an happy to hear that since there was no issue to discuss
Regards
Ka  

Sent from my iPhone

> On 10 Aug 2015, at 12:34, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> 
> Dear Kavouss,
> 
> According to mail from Alissa, the call on the 12th is cancelled.
> 
>   Patrik
> 
>> On 10 Aug 2015, at 12:14, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> 
>> Patrik
>> What is the agenda of 12 August
>> Why we need that meeting
>> Pls send the agenda
>> Regards
>> Kavouss
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On 7 Aug 2015, at 19:58, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 7 Aug 2015, at 19:52, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, I think that makes sense.
>>>> A notification could be published saying that we are now in the public comment period for the final proposal and comments should come in that way
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Patrik
>>> 
>>>> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 12:44 PM
>>>> To: IANA etc etc Coordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
>>>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?
>>>> 
>>>> Per my exchange below with Olivier, do people think we should suspend the ICG forum during the public comment period so that we receive all comments through a single channel and they all get posted in one place to the public comment archive?
>>>> 
>>>> Alissa
>>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in<mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Comments from Richard Hill
>>>> Date: August 7, 2015 at 9:40:10 AM PDT
>>>> To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>>
>>>> Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com<mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>>
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Olivier,
>>>> 
>>>> The ICG forum has existed since shortly after the ICG was formed in 2014 and we have received a smattering of comments there over the course of the last year. The comments referenced below were received before the opening of the ICG public comment period. It is a good question whether we should at this point suspend the forum so that people are not confused about how to submit comments to us, as we have separate submission mechanisms for public comments about the transition proposal. I will raise this with the ICG.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alissa
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:36 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Jonathan and Alissa,
>>>> 
>>>> I have a question about process here: how are the ICG and the CWG treating comments that fall outside a public consultation period? Are these receiving special treatment and if so, why? I note the CWG has just opened a public consultation period - should these comment have gone into the CWG consultation rather than using this seemingly special track?
>>>> Kindest regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Olivier
>>>> On 28/07/2015 11:54, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>>>> Alissa,
>>>> 
>>>> Thank-you for this, please do go ahead and send the ICG thoughts on this through to the CWG.
>>>> 
>>>> Jonathan
>>>> 
>>>> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
>>>> Sent: 27 July 2015 16:39
>>>> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org> IANA <cwg-stewardship at icann.org><mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>>>> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Comments from Richard Hill
>>>> 
>>>> CWG,
>>>> The ICG has received the following from Richard Hill: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-June/000001.html> According to the process the ICG uses to handle forum comments <https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/Community-Comments-Handling-1May15-final.pdf>, the ICG assesses whether the comments are to be investigated by the operational community itself, and if we draw that conclusion we make the OC aware of the comment and ask whether the OC has any input. So we would appreciate input you may have no later than August 10.
>>>> 
>>>> The ICG has also reviewed these questions in light of the CWG charter and process, and we would be happy to send our thoughts if helpful to the CWG.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 
>>>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>> 
>>>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>>>> 
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org