[Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?

Mon Aug 10 10:10:15 UTC 2015

These exchange of messages are time consuming and totally counterproductive. I request colleagues to be more effective
Kavouss

Sent from my iPhone

> On 9 Aug 2015, at 01:22, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
> 
> +1 .. makes sense and it's good to redirect to the correct channel ..
> I think we also need to announce this on the ICG website?
> 
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Alhadeff
> Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 3:52 PM
> To: mundy at tislabs.com; milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu; mnuduma at yahoo.com
> Cc: mundy at tislabs.com; internal-cg at ianacg.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?
> 
> +1 With a redirect to the correct channel...
> 
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Mary Uduma [mnuduma at yahoo.com]
> Received: Saturday, 08 Aug 2015, 12:01AM
> To: Russ Mundy [mundy at tislabs.com]; Mueller, Milton L [milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu]
> CC: Russ Mundy [mundy at tislabs.com]; IANA etc etc Coordination Group [internal-cg at ianacg.org]
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?
> 
> +1
> 
> Mary Uduma 
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. 
>        From: Russ MundySent: Friday, 7 August 2015 21:08To: Mueller, Milton LCc: Russ Mundy; IANA etc etc Coordination GroupSubject: Re: [Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?
> 
> On Aug 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I think that makes sense.
> 
> A notification could be published saying that we are now in the public comment period for the final proposal and comments should come in that way
> 
> +1 - makes sense to me to have a single comment “channel” active at a time.  Russ M
> 
> 
> 
> From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper
> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 12:44 PM
> To: IANA etc etc Coordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
> Subject: [Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?
> 
> 
> 
> Per my exchange below with Olivier, do people think we should suspend the ICG forum during the public comment period so that we receive all comments through a single channel and they all get posted in one place to the public comment archive?
> 
> 
> 
> Alissa
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>
> 
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Comments from Richard Hill
> 
> Date: August 7, 2015 at 9:40:10 AM PDT
> 
> To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> 
> Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Olivier,
> 
> 
> 
> The ICG forum has existed since shortly after the ICG was formed in 2014 and we have received a smattering of comments there over the course of the last year. The comments referenced below were received before the opening of the ICG public comment period. It is a good question whether we should at this point suspend the forum so that people are not confused about how to submit comments to us, as we have separate submission mechanisms for public comments about the transition proposal. I will raise this with the ICG.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alissa
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:36 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Jonathan and Alissa,
> 
> I have a question about process here: how are the ICG and the CWG treating comments that fall outside a public consultation period? Are these receiving special treatment and if so, why? I note the CWG has just opened a public consultation period - should these comment have gone into the CWG consultation rather than using this seemingly special track?
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> On 28/07/2015 11:54, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> 
> Alissa,
> 
> 
> 
> Thank-you for this, please do go ahead and send the ICG thoughts on this through to the CWG.
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in] 
> Sent: 27 July 2015 16:39
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org IANA <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Comments from Richard Hill
> 
> 
> 
> CWG,
> 
> The ICG has received the following from Richard Hill: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-June/000001.html> According to the process the ICG uses to handle forum comments <https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/Community-Comments-Handling-1May15-final.pdf>, the ICG assesses whether the comments are to be investigated by the operational community itself, and if we draw that conclusion we make the OC aware of the comment and ask whether the OC has any input. So we would appreciate input you may have no later than August 10.
> 
> 
> 
> The ICG has also reviewed these questions in light of the CWG charter and process, and we would be happy to send our thoughts if helpful to the CWG.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
> 
> _______________________________________________CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org