[Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?

[Mueller, Milton L]

Yes, I think that makes sense.
A notification could be published saying that we are now in the public comment period for the final proposal and comments should come in that way

From: Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at ianacg.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 12:44 PM
To: IANA etc etc Coordination Group <internal-cg at ianacg.org>
Subject: [Internal-cg] Suspend ICG forum during public comment period?

Per my exchange below with Olivier, do people think we should suspend the ICG forum during the public comment period so that we receive all comments through a single channel and they all get posted in one place to the public comment archive?

Alissa

Begin forwarded message:


From: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in<mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Comments from Richard Hill
Date: August 7, 2015 at 9:40:10 AM PDT
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>>
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com<mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>>

Hi Olivier,

The ICG forum has existed since shortly after the ICG was formed in 2014 and we have received a smattering of comments there over the course of the last year. The comments referenced below were received before the opening of the ICG public comment period. It is a good question whether we should at this point suspend the forum so that people are not confused about how to submit comments to us, as we have separate submission mechanisms for public comments about the transition proposal. I will raise this with the ICG.

Thanks,
Alissa

On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:36 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:


Dear Jonathan and Alissa,

I have a question about process here: how are the ICG and the CWG treating comments that fall outside a public consultation period? Are these receiving special treatment and if so, why? I note the CWG has just opened a public consultation period - should these comment have gone into the CWG consultation rather than using this seemingly special track?
Kindest regards,

Olivier
On 28/07/2015 11:54, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Alissa,

Thank-you for this, please do go ahead and send the ICG thoughts on this through to the CWG.

Jonathan

From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in]
Sent: 27 July 2015 16:39
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org> IANA <cwg-stewardship at icann.org><mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Comments from Richard Hill

CWG,
The ICG has received the following from Richard Hill: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-June/000001.html> According to the process the ICG uses to handle forum comments <https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/Community-Comments-Handling-1May15-final.pdf>, the ICG assesses whether the comments are to be investigated by the operational community itself, and if we draw that conclusion we make the OC aware of the comment and ask whether the OC has any input. So we would appreciate input you may have no later than August 10.

The ICG has also reviewed these questions in light of the CWG charter and process, and we would be happy to send our thoughts if helpful to the CWG.

Thanks,
Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG




_______________________________________________

CWG-Stewardship mailing list

CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150807/fe8c2413/attachment.html>