[Internal-cg] Consultation Comments

[Subrenat, Jean-Jacques]

Daniel +1.
Jean-Jacques.




----- Mail original -----
De: "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
À: internal-cg at ianacg.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Août 2015 20:33:42
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Consultation Comments

"If you do not mention an organisation your comment will be treated as
coming from an individual. If you mention the organisation your comment
will be treated as coming from the organisation."

Anything else is too much open for interpretation.

Daniel

On 6.08.15 20:26 , Martin Boyle wrote:
> I note that of the 10 comments received to date only two have completed
> the “organisation” field.  Am I the only one to be concerned by this
> lack of identification?
> 
>  
> 
> Could we adjust the form to make this field compulsory?  (It could be
> completed as “individual” as the first submission has done.)  Or should
> we warn that those who do not complete the organisation field will be
> deemed to be filing personal comments?
> 
>  
> 
> I’m ok with people indicating:
> 
> ·         Individual
> 
> ·         Organisation nnn, but personal input
> 
> ·         Organisation input
> 
>  
> 
> I am particularly concerned by an input from “community representative”
> which gives no indication of origins.  I am afraid I instinctively
> discount such input – perhaps unfairly.
> 
>  
> 
> But perhaps my sore throat is making me particularly curmudgeonly this
> evening.
> 
>  
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
> 

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org