[Internal-cg] No need to answer all questions

[Paul Wilson]

Dear Kavouss,

With respect, these are very serious allegations, and I honestly have no 
idea how you can make such a claim.

I must ask you to explain how you have reached this conclusion.

Thanks,

Paul Wilson
APNIC.



On 5 Aug 2015, at 2:50, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:

> I do not agree with Alan
> We need not yo add or modify ant thing
> CRISP snd IETF tried at every occasion to undermine the process as 
> they do not believe the need fir transition of Stewardship
> Kavouss
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 4 Aug 2015, at 18:34, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>>
>> I think I disagree. We already say that use of the web form itself is 
>> optional, so people can email in whatever comments they want. On the 
>> web form itself, we use red asterisks to indicate required fields and 
>> none of the question boxes have an asterisk. (We could make that 
>> asterisk explanation larger if we want.) The more complete answers we 
>> get the better, so I don’t particularly want to encourage people 
>> not to answer the questions, and I think the form and the 
>> instructions are clear about what the options are for commenting.
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3 Aug 2015, at 6:40, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I heard a remark that suggests people are unsure about whether 
>>>> public comments should answer ALL the questions.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest adding "You may answer as many or as few questions as you 
>>>> wish" in the following places:
>>>>
>>>> * Near the top of the comment form at 
>>>> <https://comments.ianacg.org/form>
>>>>
>>>> * Just after "Specific questions about which the ICG is seeking 
>>>> comment
>>>> are listed below" in the call for comments at
>>>> <https://www.ianacg.org/calls-for-input/combined-proposal-public-comment-period/#callforcomment>
>>>
>>> Sounds reasonable.
>>>
>>> We chairs and secretariat will have a call later today (8 hours from 
>>> now or so) and discuss some more details on practical things related 
>>> to the input we might get, and we add this to the agenda.
>>>
>>> Patrik
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
>> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org

________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                        dg at apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                                            @apnicdg