[Internal-cg] [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN
Wu Kuo-Wei
kuoweiwu at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 12:31:17 UTC 2015
Jari,
Will this update message be in public soon?
Kuo Wu
> Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> 於 2015年4月30日 20:12 寫道:
>
> FYI
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
>> Subject: [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN
>> Date: 30 Apr 2015 12:57:53 GMT+1
>> To: ianaplan at ietf.org
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> This is an update to the community on the current discussion between
>> the IETF and ICANN regarding the annual SLA or Supplemental Agreement.
>> Each year, the IETF (via the IAOC) and ICANN specify a supplemental
>> agreement to our Memorandum of Understanding, in order to ensure that
>> any gaps or identified operational issues are addressed.
>>
>> As you are aware, inspired by the request from the IANA Stewardship
>> Transition Coordination Group (ICG), last year we formed the IANAPLAN
>> working group and achieved IETF consensus on the state of affairs with
>> IANA registries published under the direction of the IETF. That
>> consensus is captured in draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09, which was
>> transmitted to the ICG. In that document the community sought to have
>> some facts acknowledged as part of any IANA transition plan:
>>
>> o The protocol parameters registries are in the public domain. It
>> is the preference of the IETF community that all relevant parties
>> acknowledge that fact as part of the transition.
>>
>> o It is possible in the future that the operation of the protocol
>> parameters registries may be transitioned from ICANN to subsequent
>> operator(s). It is the preference of the IETF community that, as
>> part of the NTIA transition, ICANN acknowledge that it will carry
>> out the obligations established under C.7.3 and I.61 of the
>> current IANA functions contract between ICANN and the NTIA
>> [NTIA-Contract] to achieve a smooth transition to subsequent
>> operator(s), should the need arise. Furthermore, in the event of
>> a transition it is the expectation of the IETF community that
>> ICANN, the IETF, and subsequent operator(s) will work together to
>> minimize disruption in the use the protocol parameters registries
>> or other resources currently located at iana.org.
>>
>> Understanding this consensus, the IETF leadership have been
>> negotiating with ICANN to include text to satisfy these points in our
>> annual Service Level Agreement. After some iterations, we arrived at
>> text that we think captures the IETF consensus, but ICANN has informed
>> us that they are unable to agree to that text right now. ICANN told
>> us that, in their opinion, agreeing to that text now would possibly
>> put them in breach of their existing agreement with the NTIA.
>>
>> It is our view that the substance of the statements above is already
>> part of our agreement with ICANN, and that we are merely elaborating
>> details of that existing agreement. We expect that as we continue
>> towards the orderly winding down of NTIA's involvement in the IANA
>> processes, our existing arrangements will be preserved, in keeping
>> with IETF consensus.
>>
>> We will of course continue to assess the situation, agreements, and
>> next steps, as well as developments in other operational
>> communities. We think that the existing agreement between ICANN and
>> the IETF makes good sense, and is good for the Internet. The IETF has
>> stated very strongly that it supports that existing agreement. That
>> strong support is a necessary condition for success, and we shall not
>> waver in our commitment to the IETF's continued responsible
>> stewardship of the protocol parameters registries.
>>
>> We note that the IETF community remains very satisfied with ICANN's
>> current level of performance. The existing supplemental agreement,
>> from last year, continues until it is replaced.
>>
>> We welcome your thoughts about this situation. We will continue to
>> use the IANAPLAN mailing list for these discussions.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jari Arkko
>> IETF Chair
>>
>> Tobias Gondrom
>> IAOC Chair
>>
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> IAB Chair
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at mm.ianacg.org
> http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list