[Internal-cg] CWG proposal preassessment

[Patrik Fältström]

> On 23 apr 2015, at 16:20, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> 
> I think it would be inappropriate for the ICG to file public comments

FWIW, I strongly support this view.

ICG should have as a role to listen and see what the bottom up process creates, and then evaluate whether the proposals are conflicting, complete etc etc.

   Patrik

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150423/68e0023c/attachment.asc>