<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear All,</div><div>It is surprising that after so many messages and so many weaning still ICANN LEGAL DEPARETMENT oir Lawyers of Snidely and Adler insist to have cross reference to unknown and unwritten documents.</div><div>It is legally inappropriate and wrong to provide a anklet overgraze to some documents the constant of which is unknown'</div><div>Rgis is against the very interest of ICG </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-04-30 19:20 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paf@frobbit.se" target="_blank">paf@frobbit.se</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On 30 Apr 2016, at 17:16, Mueller, Milton L wrote:<br>
<br>
> The only answer I saw to this was that we don\u2019t need to worry about it because the PTI contract will be put up for public comment.<br>
<br>
</span>A public comment period should not be The Mechanism that is used to ensure the proposal stays within the realm of the documents produced. The process followed to create the bylaws must include validation mechanisms to minimize deviation.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Patrik<br>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>