<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; font-size:10pt;"><div>I think this is a good way forward and would support it.</div><div><br></div><div>Lynn</div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size:10pt; color:black; font-family:verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26<br>
From: Jari Arkko <<a href="mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net">jari.arkko@piuha.net</a>><br>
Date: Tue, March 01, 2016 12:47 am<br>
To: WUKnoben <<a href="mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de">wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de</a>><br>
Cc: "Mueller, Milton L" <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu">milton@gatech.edu</a>>, IANA etc etcCoordination<br>
Group <<a href="mailto:internal-cg@ianacg.org">internal-cg@ianacg.org</a>><br>
<br>
Trying to cut to the chase a bit.<br>
<br>
What is important, I think, is that once (and if) the necessary approvals are in, the ICG can act quickly and does not have to schedule another call before it can send the proposal forward to the board. I recall that it was difficult to setup a virtual meeting during the ICANN week...<br>
<br>
So how about this reformulation of Alissa\u2019s two items:<br>
<br>
1. Agree that v10 is ready.<br>
<br>
2. Agree that, per the CWG message, dependencies to CCWG work are complete if or when the current proposal is approved by the chartering organisations.<br>
<br>
3. Authorise the ICG chairs to send the proposal to the board without further ICG meeting, if and when the chartering organisations approve the CCWG proposal.<br>
<br>
Jari<br>
<br>
<hr>_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>