<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from rtf -->
<style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<font face="Calibri" size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div>Many thanks Alissa for sharing this version in advance of the call .. All looks good to me ..</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I did 2 minor edits but have no strong position on any of them .. Edits are attached in track changes, available on Dropbox and underlined below for everyone's convenience:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Para X018 -> now X016:</div>
<div>Many commenters in the public comment period noted the CWG dependency on ICANN-level accountability mechanisms that were, at the time of the public comment period, under development in the CCWG and <u>noted</u> the associated difficulty in judging the
overall accountability provided by the Names proposal.</div>
<div>Rationale: this part of the sentence is now too far and I think we need to link it back to what the commenters 'noted'. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Paras 112 and X031 -> now X029: </div>
<div>"The ICG unanimously supports this proposal and recommends that all affected parties implement it. <u>The ICG approved this version and agreed to submitting it to NTIA via the ICANN Board.</u>"</div>
<div>Rationale: this was mentioned somewhere in the deleted text .. I feel it's worth mentioning .. not necessarily here if there's a better place .. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Looking forward to our call later today ..</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kind Regards</div>
<div>--Manal</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Internal-cg [<a href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org">mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper<br>
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 6:48 PM<br>
To: IANA etc etcCoordination Group<br>
Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposal approval and agenda for call #26[WARNING: ATTACHMENT UNSCANNED]</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Dear all,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>We have received confirmation from the CWG that the CCWG proposal meets its requirements. Therefore, we are now in a position to approve our final proposal for transmission to NTIA via the ICANN Board. The final proposal, with edits made to the sections
that previously referenced the CWG-CCWG dependency, is attached to this message in redline and clean form. They are also available on Dropbox:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lzepe727bxqz20/IANA-transition-proposal-v10.docx?dl=0">https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lzepe727bxqz20/IANA-transition-proposal-v10.docx?dl=0</a></div>
<div><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/j65tohvyy59ellt/IANA-transition-proposal-v10-clean.docx?dl=0">https://www.dropbox.com/s/j65tohvyy59ellt/IANA-transition-proposal-v10-clean.docx?dl=0</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>We will ask for the ICG\u2019s approval of this final version on our March 1 call (12:00 UTC). Here is the proposed agenda for the call:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1. Approval of final transition proposal 2. Update on communications plans</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Feedback on the agenda is welcome.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Alissa</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>