<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Joe,</div><div><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Thank you very much for comments</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Nevertheless, there are issues that we, the ICG Liaison may bring to
your attention resulted from Supplement Report .As you know CCWG has scheduled
a f2f meeting on 04 March in Marrakesh. It would be good to reflect on the
supplement and we, the Liaisons report back the ICG comments.</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 0pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">By the way the extraordinary/ devoted call for REC 11( and its impact on
<span>�</span>Recs 1 and 2)was held today at 12,00
UTC, This meeting favorably considered the compromise package that I had
submitted( jointly prepared by me and Beckie Burr) .That compromise is being
posted on CCWG wikie / mailing list and Chartering Organizations are requested
to provide their final comment for another <span>�</span>call scheduled on <span>�</span>Monday 08 Feb </span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Regards</span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="background:white;margin:0cm 0cm 6.75pt;line-height:normal;vertical-align:middle"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt">Kavouss </span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-04 14:25 GMT+01:00 Joseph Alhadeff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
I'm fine with scheduling a call when you guys feel we are best
positioned to have the answer of CWG.� That being said, I'm not sure
what if any deliberation is needed if CWG says that their
dependencies are satisfied.<br>
<br>
Joe<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<div>On 2/4/2016 2:12 AM, Narelle Clark
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The ICG certainly does not want to be
the source of any delay.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I thought we were going to schedule a
call for both before and after ICANN55?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Then cancel or keep as applies.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Narelle</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> Internal-cg
[<a href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org" target="_blank">mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>] <b>On Behalf
Of </b>Alissa Cooper<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 4 February 2016 7:48 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> IANA etc etcCoordination Group<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Internal-cg] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Update
on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
Recommendations</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please take a look at the message below
from the CCWG list as well as the formal statement from the
co-chairs here:�<a href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs</a></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The CCWG is aiming to have its proposal
ready for the chartering organizations to approve it
before or during ICANN 55. In light of this, Mohamed,
Patrik and I believe the ICG needs to do the following:</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(1) Plan to ask the CWG for
confirmation that their requirements are met as soon as
the CCWG proposal goes to the chartering orgs, and give
the CWG a heads-up that we intend to do that so they can
respond promptly.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(2) Schedule an ICG call for March 1.
Hopefully we will have heard back from the CWG by then
and we can discuss approval of our final proposal then,
but it will be before anyone is in transit to Marrakesh.
We do not have to wait for the chartering orgs to finish
our business. If the timeline slips, we can cancel this
call when it gets closer to the date. (Alternatively we
could confirm approval of our final proposal strictly
via email, but I am assuming folks would prefer to do so
on a call.)</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I would also like to ask the group to
reconsider the idea of scheduling a conference call at
the end of the ICANN week, if we can find a time with
interpreter availability. If the CCWG timeline does slip
a bit such that we have not yet gotten a response from
the CWG by March 1, I do not want the ICG to be in a
position of causing any additional delay. If we schedule
a call at the end of the ICANN week to discuss approval
of our final proposal, we have less risk of doing that.
Otherwise it may get bumped to the week following ICANN
55, even if the CCWG proposal gets forwarded to the
ICANN Board during the meeting. I firmly believe that
every single day matters at this point.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Your thoughts on all of the above are
much appreciated.�</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Alissa</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Begin forwarded message:</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From: </span></b><span>Mathieu
Weill <<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR:
Update on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of
WS1 Recommendations</span></b></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>Date: </span></b><span>February
2, 2016 at 11:53:16 PM PST</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>To: </span></b><span>"CCWG
Accountability" <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Dear Colleagues,<span>�</span></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Please find
below for your information the note sent today to
the Chartering Organization chairs, in line with
our discussions during our meeting #82.<span>�</span></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">�</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">This will be
added to our correspondence section of the wiki.<span>�</span></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">�</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Best</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Mathieu</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">�</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>De�:</span></b><span><span>�</span></span><span>Mathieu
Weill [<a href="mailto:weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank"><span>mailto:weill@afnic.fr</span></a>]<span>�</span><br>
<b>Envoy�:</b><span>�</span>mercredi
3 f�vrier 2016 08:52<br>
<b>��:</b><span>�</span>'James
Bladel'; 'Byron Holland'; 'Louis Lee'; 'Alan
Greenberg'; 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Lars-Johan
Liman'; 'Tripti Sinha'; 'Patrik F�ltstr�m';
'Alissa Cooper'; 'Mohamed El Bashir';
'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Lise Fuhr'<br>
<b>Cc�:</b><span>�</span>'David
Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Bruce Tonkin';
'Theresa Swinehart'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'Le�n
Felipe S�nchez Amb�a'; 'ACCT-STAFF'<br>
<b>Objet�:</b><span>�</span>Update
on Timeline for Chartering Org Approval of WS1
Recommendations</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Dear all,</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Yesterday,
the co-Chairs issued a<span>�</span></span><span><a href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/leading-into-marrakech-an-update-from-the-ccwg-accountability-co-chairs" target="_blank"><span lang="EN-US">formal statement</span></a><span>�</span></span><span lang="EN-US">updating the community on the
status of the Work Stream 1 Recommendations
and providing insight into the steps the
CCWG-Accountability will be taking in
developing the supplemental draft.�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Our hope is that the
majority of changes from the Third Draft
Report will relate to specificities of
implementation rather than content, and as
such, an additional public comment period
will not be necessary before approval by the
Chartering Organizations.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>In light of progress
made and in assessing the outstanding
issues, we have announced a target to
distribute the supplemental report to our
Chartering Organizations in time for
consideration and approval on all Work
Stream 1 Recommendations during ICANN55 in
Marrakech.�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The various SOs and
ACs approach their work and schedules
differently and we are respectfully asking
that you take this into account as you plan
your discussions before and during ICANN55.�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>With that said, we
encourage any Chartering Organizations that
can deliberate and/or approve the Work
Stream 1 Recommendations prior to Marrakech
to please do so.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>We are grateful for
your input on the Third Draft Report and for
your continued engagement in the development
of the revised Work Stream 1
Recommendations. We hope to continue this
open dialogue as the supplemental report is
finalized, and we are also hoping that all
potential issues have been raised to the
CCWG-Accountability so they can be mitigated
in our revisions. Our objective is to
provide the Chartering Organizations a
simple and straightforward approval process.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Following approval
from the Chartering Organizations, we have
asked the ICANN Board to be mindful of the
timeline as they plan their review period of
the Work Stream 1 Recommendations and
submission to NTIA.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>We have seen
increased involvement from the ICANN Board
as our work progressed since the Third Draft
Report. By enabling us to understand Board
comments in real-time, the following
potential global public interest concerns
stemming from the Board\u2019s comments in
December, have been discussed:</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span>Inspection rights have
been fully addressed.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span>Budget process
concerns have been fully addressed.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span>Work Stream 2 concerns
have been fully addressed.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span>Human rights concerns
have been discussed and the group has adjusted
its recommendation, however Board concerns
still exist.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span>Concerns on ICANN\u2019s
Mission are still being discussed.</span></li>
</ul>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>As always, please not
hesitate to reach out to us should you have
any questions or concerns.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Best regards,</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Mathieu, Thomas, Le�n</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>�</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
</span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank"><span>Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</span></a><span><br>
</span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank"><span>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</span></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">�</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><span><pre>_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a>
</pre>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>