<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Different forms of language have been used to the same end. A
majority of comments supported... I chose this construction,
because the majority of comments which may have even included other
concerns did not bring up jurisdiction and some that did, did not
suggest that it precluded moving forward on the transition.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/22/2015 7:20 AM, michael niebel
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMK78HXW87mgMbnf17+v+Zsoq1xV0P+q6WK_uVmA5jczps8RvA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Yes, Joe, it would.
<div><br>
<div>From a systematic point of view: are we positioning also
other issues with regard to the question whether they are
"considered <span style="font-size:12.8px"> </span><span
style="font-size:12.8px">as a limiting factor to the
consideration of the proposal" ? </span></div>
</div>
<div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Michael</span></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:50 AM, joseph
alhadeff <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> overall. Would that
word as a modifier to comments address the confusion? the
majority of overall comments...<br>
<br>
<div>On 10/22/2015 6:47 AM, michael niebel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Agree. Just one question: does the last
sentence " The majority of comments .." mean the
majority of comments that raised the jurisdiction
issue or the overall majority of comments ?
<div>Michael</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:41
AM, Jandyr Ferreira dos Santos Junior <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jandyr.santos@itamaraty.gov.br"
target="_blank">jandyr.santos@itamaraty.gov.br</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Likewise.<br>
<br>
Joe's text is accurate and does not predetermine
the scope of the discussion on jurisdiction
post-transition.<br>
<br>
<br>
Jandyr<br>
________________________________________<br>
De: Internal-cg [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org"
target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>]
em nome de Drazek, Keith [<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a></a>]<br>
Enviado: quinta-feira, 22 de outubro de 2015 8:30<br>
Para: joseph alhadeff; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg@ianacg.org"
target="_blank">internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br>
Assunto: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible<br>
<br>
I support Joe's proposed jurisdiction language
below. It is factual and does not seek to
predetermine the scope of discussion
post-transition.<br>
<br>
Keith<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Internal-cg [mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org">internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a></a>]
On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff<br>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:20 AM<br>
To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:internal-cg@ianacg.org"
target="_blank">internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible<br>
<br>
Possible text on Jurisdiction:<br>
<br>
A number of comments highlighted the issue of
Jurisdiction as important. A minority objected to
any transition at all because they perceived that
US was relinquishing jurisdiction. Another
minority point of view raised concerns that the
jurisdiction was not international or outside of
the US. A number of comments also suggested that
CCWG Workstream 2 might be a place to address some
of the continued<br>
concerns about jurisdiction. The majority of
comments did not find<br>
jurisdiction as a limiting factor to the
consideration proposal.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org"
target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org"
target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org"
target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>