<div dir="ltr">Agree. Just one question: does the last sentence " The majority of comments .." mean the majority of comments that raised the jurisdiction issue or the overall majority of comments ?<div>Michael</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jandyr Ferreira dos Santos Junior <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jandyr.santos@itamaraty.gov.br" target="_blank">jandyr.santos@itamaraty.gov.br</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Likewise.<br>
<br>
Joe's text is accurate and does not predetermine the scope of the discussion on jurisdiction post-transition.<br>
<br>
<br>
Jandyr<br>
________________________________________<br>
De: Internal-cg [<a href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org">internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>] em nome de Drazek, Keith [<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>]<br>
Enviado: quinta-feira, 22 de outubro de 2015 8:30<br>
Para: joseph alhadeff; <a href="mailto:internal-cg@ianacg.org">internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br>
Assunto: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible<br>
<br>
I support Joe's proposed jurisdiction language below. It is factual and does not seek to predetermine the scope of discussion post-transition.<br>
<br>
Keith<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Internal-cg [mailto:<a href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org">internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff<br>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:20 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:internal-cg@ianacg.org">internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible<br>
<br>
Possible text on Jurisdiction:<br>
<br>
A number of comments highlighted the issue of Jurisdiction as important.� A minority objected to any transition at all because they perceived that US was relinquishing jurisdiction.� Another minority point of view raised concerns that the jurisdiction was not international or outside of the US.� A number of comments also suggested that CCWG Workstream 2 might be a place to address some of the continued<br>
concerns about jurisdiction.� � The majority of comments did not find<br>
jurisdiction as a limiting factor to the consideration proposal.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>